BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

dumping ordiance

Expert replies
by showbu » Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:11 pm
This country' current dumping ordinance, which requires that all refuse be hauled at least ten miles outside the city limits for dumping, should be repealed in the interest of public health. The purpose of the ordinance in the first place was to prevent the spread of Smith's Disease, which has been found to be most prevalent in regions near outdoor dumps. But the country funds used to maintain the roads to the dumping sites have been diverted from a proposed countrywide education program for Smith's Disease awareness, which would have been more effective than the dumping ordinance in preventing the disease.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the dissertation that the dumping ordinance should be repealed?

a. the geographic area within the city limits is more heavily populated than the area outside the city limits

b. treating smith's disease is more expensive on average than preventing it in the first place

c the roads to the dumping sites are of no practical use other than for transport between the city limits and the dumping sites

d. the proposed education program would have been available to all country residents

e. the most effective means of preventing smith's disease is an expensive vaccine that is not readily available
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: dumping ordiance

by logitech » Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:39 pm
So the argument basically says that if people know that what causes smith's disease, the city does not need to dumb the waste outside the city. So

d. the proposed education program would have been available to all country residents
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 6:12 pm
Clear case of (C).

If roads serve multiple purposes whereas education serves only one purpose, then it is OK to divert the fund to maintenance of roads and argument falls apart.
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:22 am
This country' current dumping ordinance, which requires that all refuse be hauled at least ten miles outside the city limits for dumping, should be repealed in the interest of public health. The purpose of the ordinance in the first place was to prevent the spread of Smith's Disease, which has been found to be most prevalent in regions near outdoor dumps. But the country funds used to maintain the roads to the dumping sites have been diverted from a proposed countrywide education program for Smith's Disease awareness, which would have been more effective than the dumping ordinance in preventing the disease.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the dissertation that the dumping ordinance should be repealed?

a. the geographic area within the city limits is more heavily populated than the area outside the city limits

b. treating smith's disease is more expensive on average than preventing it in the first place

c the roads to the dumping sites are of no practical use other than for transport between the city limits and the dumping sites

d. the proposed education program would have been available to all country residents

e. the most effective means of preventing smith's disease is an expensive vaccine that is not readily available


Conclusion: should be repealed... as
purpose was to prevent which has been prevalent near outdoor dumps.....


IMO A
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 1:45 pm
I guess it's A
Join the discussion