- thephoenix
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
- Thanked: 137 times
- Followed by:5 members
I'm inclined to think it's E.
the argument states, higher pollution --> tougher it is for the mammal to fight off viral disease
E states that more mammals had viral infection in the baltic sea, therefore, it is more polluted than the water off the scottish coast.

















