i received a message regarding this thread.
i actually can't figure out what people think is the problem with the correct answer choice. do some posters have the idea that "but" and "also" can only be used within the "not only... but also" construction?
if so, that's definitely not right. both "but" and "also" are extremely common transition words that appear in a variety of contexts:
i can still come on thursday, but i'll be late.
James is a straight-A student and also a star athlete.
chocolate can make you feel good, but it can also make you fat.
it's (hopefully) obvious that all of these sentences are fine. just because you learn one particular construction -- such as "not only... but also" -- don't become myopic about the use of basic words.
--
just as importantly -- even if "not only... but also..." were grammatically correct here, it would still be wrong! this construction doesn't make any sense in the given context, because the context provides a contrast: the clearing of forests created farmland and so on (= GOOD THINGS), but it also caused erosion and large-scale deforestation (= BAD THINGS).
you can't use "not only X but also Y" in this kind of context, because that construction is meant for things that reinforce each other: if X is GOOD THINGS, then Y needs to be more GOOD THINGS. similarly for bad things.
make sure you know why the following are correct/incorrect:
chocolate can make you feel good, but it can also make you fat (correct)
chocolate can not only make you feel good but also make you fat (grammatically fine, but incorrect -- unless you think getting fat is a good thing)
not only can chocolate make you feel good, but it can also make you fat (grammatically fine, but incorrect -- unless you think getting fat is a good thing)
caffeine can give you energy, but it can also increase your mental alertness (grammatically fine, but incorrect)
caffeine can not only give you energy but also increase your mental alertness (correct)
not only can caffeine give you energy, but it can also increase your mental alertness (correct)
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
minhchau1986
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:55 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
Thank Ron. Now I clearly see the answer b is incorrect. In the sentence, using not only....statement 1....but also .....statement 2. Statement 1 and 2 need to be paralleled in meaning. Statement 2 conveys different meaning, so using' but' is appropriate
- akshaydhande
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2016 7:06 am
- Location: Navi Mumbai
- GMAT Score:630
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:OA is Dnetigen wrote:Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the
.
.
.
.
700 in reach.
Actually this is one of the simpler sentence correction questions. As soon as we read the original statement we can cancel out all "not only...but also" formations. The reason is that the two sections of the statement do not convey the same negative / positive meaning.
D clearly explains that though clearing of forests has some positive outcomes but it also causes erosion etc..
Regards.
D clearly explains that though clearing of forests has some positive outcomes but it also causes erosion etc..
Regards.












