BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Verbal Strategy

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:01 am

Verbal Strategy

by GAMATO » Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:53 am
Hi,

I have been preparing for more than a month now. I have started with Verbal as it is my weak area. I have completed studying the basics (for SC, CR and RC) and am practicing questions from BTG forum. However, I have not started solving OG 12 questions.

My question is which one of the below 2 options would be a better strategy.
Option 1: Complete all OG 12 verbal questions and then start Quants.
Option 2: Start refreshing Quants basics from MGMAT books and solve OG 12 verbal questions in parallel.

I am planning to take GMAT in January 2012.

Thanks.
Top
Source: — GMAT Strategy |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:9 members

by vaibhavgupta » Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:23 pm
GAMATO wrote:Hi,

I have been preparing for more than a month now. I have started with Verbal as it is my weak area. I have completed studying the basics (for SC, CR and RC) and am practicing questions from BTG forum. However, I have not started solving OG 12 questions.

My question is which one of the below 2 options would be a better strategy.
Option 1: Complete all OG 12 verbal questions and then start Quants.
Option 2: Start refreshing Quants basics from MGMAT books and solve OG 12 verbal questions in parallel.

I am planning to take GMAT in January 2012.

Thanks.
Option 1 to me seems better. :)
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:17 pm
I'd suggest working in parallel. It makes me nervous when students say they will first do one section, then the other. You're never going to be "done" with either, so you should consistently work on both. I'm fine with leaning more heavily Verbal or more heavily Quant at first, but to keep up skills in all areas, you really need to never fully put any one section aside.

Option 2 gets my vote.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:9 members

by vaibhavgupta » Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:45 pm
VivianKerr wrote:I'd suggest working in parallel. It makes me nervous when students say they will first do one section, then the other. You're never going to be "done" with either, so you should consistently work on both. I'm fine with leaning more heavily Verbal or more heavily Quant at first, but to keep up skills in all areas, you really need to never fully put any one section aside.

Option 2 gets my vote.
I voted for option 1 cos i felt that u need to do OG (be it verbal or quant) before going into other books. But i fully agree with VivianKerr and second that u shouldn't just work on a particular section of gmat! :)
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:01 am

by GAMATO » Fri Oct 28, 2011 7:59 am
Thanks Vivian and Vaibhav for the valuable suggestion. I will go with Option 2.Thanks.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:9 members

by vaibhavgupta » Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:05 am
GAMATO wrote:Thanks Vivian and Vaibhav for the valuable suggestion. I will go with Option 2.Thanks.
All the best ! :)
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1