BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Kaplan Test Confusing SC.

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:13 am
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

Kaplan Test Confusing SC.

by rakeshd347 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:58 pm
Some historians estimate that in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, twice as much acreage was destroyed than had earlier been ravaged in Napoleon's Moscow burnings of 1812 and the Great Fire of London of 1666 combined.

than had earlier been
than the amount that was earlier
over the amount that was previously
as had earlier been
as was

Source Kaplan Tests.

OA D

My confusion is between D and E. Even though in D the dates are clearly mentioned so we don't need had been here. Obviously 1871 came after 1812 so why do we need to show the sequence of time. This is my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:44 pm
Hi rakeshd347,

This SC has an odd style to it, but I think I know what the author's "intent" was.

The Sentence Corrections that appear on the GMAT are built on an established set of rules that you WILL see in some form on Test Day.

One of those rules is this specific verb rule (which I'll put into real basic terms): If you see two "past events" in a sentence, then you should use the verb "had."

Here, the acreage that was "destroyed" (past tense) was twice as much as.... that "combined" (another past tense). Since we have two past tense events, we should use the word "had"

This points to answer D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 3:22 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:3 members

by \'manpreet singh » Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:29 pm
First of all Rakesh kindly underline the relevant part in the question.:)

I would agree with Rakesh since the dates are mentioned and moreover the word "earlier" is also used.I think the usage of the word "had" is optional.So according to me verb sequencing is not required.I am only going with D due to idiomatic construction.I don't think you will see such a question on GMAT.

OA D

---------------------------------------------------
"Good things come to those who wait... greater things come to those who get off their ass and do anything to make it happen."
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:31 pm
rakeshd347 wrote:Some historians estimate that in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, twice as much acreage was destroyed than had earlier been ravaged in Napoleon's Moscow burnings of 1812 and the Great Fire of London of 1666 combined.

than had earlier been
than the amount that was earlier
over the amount that was previously
as had earlier been
as was

Source Kaplan Tests.

OA D

My confusion is between D and E. Even though in D the dates are clearly mentioned so we don't need had been here. Obviously 1871 came after 1812 so why do we need to show the sequence of time. This is my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I'm happy to share my two cents. :-)

First of all, here's a blog article on the idioms of comparison:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idioms-of-comparison/

One concept this questions tests is the difference between two correct forms
(a) [comparative] than
(b) as [adjective] as
and the very frequent mistake pattern
(c) as .. than
The GMAT LOVES to test this one. I like this part of the question. Clearly, on this basis, we can eliminate (A) & (B) & (C).

That gets us down to (D) & (E), which has only a split about verb tense. In this respect, I don't think this is the best question, because this split is highly debatable. The question creators have decreed that (D) is the OA, but don't fall into the trap of automatically assuming that the question creators have divine status. Regardless of the test prep company, test-prep-company-right is not the same league as official-material-right. You are correct ---- there definitely are instances in the OG in which the OA will avoid the past perfect if other indications of time sequence are present in the sentence. I have noticed, in a situation such as this, the OG never will leave us with just a bare comparison of two verb tenses, and nothing else. If they want to indicate the choice of one verb tense over another, they always have other issues brewing among the answer choices, so that the verb tense is inevitable. The trouble with this split ---as this sentence stands, there's a strong argument for (D) and a strong argument for (E), and both sides could find evidence in the OG.

Here's a blog about the perfect tenses:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-verb- ... ct-tenses/

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1