BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Boldface

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:15 am
City Official: At City Hospital, uninsured patients tend to have shorter stays and fewer procedures performed than do insured patients, even though insured patients, on average, have slightly less serious medical problems at the time of admission to the hospital than uninsured patients have. Critics of the hospital have concluded that the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care. However, this conclusion is almost certainly false. Careful investigation has recently shown two things: insured patients have much longer stays in the hospital than necessary, and they tend to have more procedures performed than are medically necessary.
In the city official’s argument, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first states the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second states that conclusion.
C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second states the position that the city official’s argument opposes.
D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument.
E. The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

OA after few posts..
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat740 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 5:55 am
Critics of the hospital have concluded that the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care.
This provides conclusion for Critics
this conclusion is almost certainly false
counter attacks the critic's conclusion and puts forward the position of the City Official

So answer is clearly D
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:04 am
the uninsured patients are mot receiving proper medical care
This is the conclusion of the hospital's critics.


this conclusion is almost certainly false
This is the conclusion of the city official.


A. The first states the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second provides support for that conclusion. You can eliminate this after the first sentence because the first is the conclusion of the critics not the city official.


B. The first is used to support the conclusion of the city official’s argument; the second states that conclusion. Again you can eliminate this after the first sentence because the first is not used to support the city official's argument. The first is actually the critic's conclusion.


C. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second states the position that the city official’s argument opposes. The second states the city official's argument, not the argument he opposes. Eliminate this.

D. The first was used to support the conclusion drawn by hospital critics; the second provides support for the conclusion of the city official’s argument. The first part is right, but the second certainly does not support the city official's argument because it IS the argument.


E. The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument. The first is the critic's conclusion and we know the city official opposes this position. Therefore, the first part of this is correct. The second part does in fact state the city official's argument. So this is correct too.

E it is
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:08 am
Ohh!!
yes answer has to be E. I missed out the bold part
E. The first states the position that the city official’s argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the city official’s argument.

I missed the word opposes and look how dramatically I landed up with the wrong answer

Thanks for Pointing it out
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:53 am
ok, so 'this conclusion is almost certainly false.' means that this is city official's argument..coz 'certainly false' is mentioned in this, right??
Join the discussion

by vertigo05 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:25 am
"E" is the best one.
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:54 pm
E it is

Thanks
Raama
Join the discussion

by boros2203 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:54 am
Just one doubt how could 2nd boldface be the conclusion , shouldn't it be counter- premise (However)


Please clarify
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 5:37 am
boros2203 wrote:Just one doubt how could 2nd boldface be the conclusion , shouldn't it be counter- premise (However)


Please clarify
indeed however introduces a counter premises which is however Careful investigation has recently shown two things: insured patients have much longer stays in the hospital than necessary, and they tend to have more procedures performed than are medically necessary. and conclusion of this is that its almost certainly false.

hence E
Join the discussion