BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question 5 (nov.24th)

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:50 pm
Stmt II

x > 4


x=5 3x+1 is 16 then remainder is 6
x=6 3x+1 is 17 then remainder is 7

x can take on many more values for which the remainder value varies(could be x=243 then remainder is 0)

INSUFFICIENT

Stmt I

x = 4n+2

3X+1 = 3(4N+2) = 12N+7

12n+7 will never be divisible by 10 since the units digit of 12*some positive integer n will never be 3 (only if the units digit is 3 will the resulting number when added to 7 have a units digit of 0 to be divisible by 10)

Units digit for 12* n will cycle as follows 2,4,6,8,0,2,4...etc

Since its a yes or no question we can confidently say NO which makes this statement SUFFICIENT to answer the question

A)
Last edited by cramya on Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:57 pm
@cramya

question. i tried 5 different possible sample values in Statement I and II both and i constantly got the answer NO for both statements.

for e.g. in statement 1, if n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 then entering the resulting x value into 3x+1 never yields a value divisible by 10.

in statement II, i used the same values 5, 6, and 7.

so couldn't I have chosen D as the answer? please let me know my mistake.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:17 pm
for e.g. in statement 1, if n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 then entering the resulting x value into 3x+1 never yields a value divisible by 10.
Since the units digit of 3 cylces as follows: 3,9,7,1,3...

U could pick a number for x where the units digit of the 3*that positive integer will give 9 as units digit and when added to 1 the units digit of the final resulting number will be 0

Eg:x=243

3(243)+1 = 730 divisible by 10 Remainder is 0

whereas in the example I have given the remainders are 6,7 etc... I should have included this too in my solution above. INSUFF cant tell if remainder is 0 or not (edited my post to include this also)

Niraj, let me know if u still have questions
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:23 pm
gotcha now, smart thinking, i'll keep a watch for units digits in remainder problems from now on.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:13 pm
Hi,
Here is how I solved:

The q stem asks whether the 3x +1 is divisible by 10 or not.
So a remainder of 0 implies YES; anything else implies a NO.

stmt1: substitute x = 4n+2 in 3x +1. => 12n +7.
Try plugging in numbers for n.
n 12n+7 Is remainder 0, when divided by 10?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0 7 NO
1 19 NO
==> there is no multiple of 12 such that the unit's digit is a 3.
If such a number exists, then 12n+7 will end in a 0.
Since, there is no such number, the ans is NO for all n.
So stmt 1 is sufficient. Another way to look at this:
the units digit of 12 is 2; any number multiplied by 2 will be even.
So the units digit of the product 12n can never end in an odd number 3.


stmt2: x >4
Try plugging in numbers:

x 3x +1 Is remainder 0 , when divided by 10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 16 NO
6 20 YES

So not suficient.

So answer is A

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

Re: Question 5 (nov.24th)

by nitin86 » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:27 am
bacali wrote:Q11:

If x is a positive integer, is the remainder 0 when 3x + 1 is divided by 10?
(1) x = 4n + 2, where n is a positive integer.
(2) x > 4


OA: A
My approach,

Stmt 1 => x = 4n + 2
Hence, x must be an even number because 4n = even, 2 = even, and sum of two even number is even.

On subsituting this value of X in 3x + 1,

3x + 1 => 3 * (4n + 2) + 1
Here, 3 * (4n+2) = even as product of even and odd is always even
1 = odd,

So, 3 * (4n + 2) + 1 has to be odd as sum of even and odd is always odd.

So, if 3x + 1 is odd, it cannot be divisible by 10.

Hence, SUFFICIENT
-------------------------
Stmt 2, is straightforward, as for differenct values of x , where x > 4, x may/may not be divisible by 10.

Hence INSUFFICIENT.

Hope this approach helps
Join the discussion

by gmataug08 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:10 pm
from stmt 1

no matter what n is, X will be even.

as X is even 3x+1 will be odd, as odd numbers can never be divided evenly by any even number (vice versa too applies), hence X is not 10 divisible.

hence stmt 1 is enough.

stmt 2 : is just there to satisfy DS question format :) , no suggestive information.
Join the discussion

Re: Question 5 (nov.24th)

by maihuna » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:46 am
bacali wrote:Q11:

If x is a positive integer, is the remainder 0 when 3x + 1 is divided by 10?
(1) x = 4n + 2, where n is a positive integer.
(2) x > 4


OA: A
I think the Q was 3^x + 1 and not 3x+1
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by hariharakarthi » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:18 pm
(3^x) + 1

x= 4n+2; power of 3's unit digits are 3,9,7,1. In this when n is a positive integer, then unit digit of 3^x is can be 3,9,7 and 1. Hence, we can not definitively say about the remainder.

X>4; reasoning is same as above.

Hence ans is E
Join the discussion

by m-sand » Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:53 am
hariharakarthi wrote:(3^x) + 1

x= 4n+2; power of 3's unit digits are 3,9,7,1. In this when n is a positive integer, then unit digit of 3^x is can be 3,9,7 and 1. Hence, we can not definitively say about the remainder.

X>4; reasoning is same as above.

Hence ans is E
Ans will be A. As, x=4n+2, unit digit of 3^x+1 will be 0. Therefore , remainder will be 0.
Join the discussion

by ajay7640 » Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:55 pm
Yes. 3^x + 1 would always be divisible by 10 as long as x=4n + 2

Note any fourth power or 3 of multiple of 4 ...so 4n th power of 3 will have 1 as units digit
3 raied to 2 is always 9
so Units digit is always 0 for 3^x + 1 as long as x= 4n + 2.

3^1 3
3^2 9
3^3 27
3^4 81 ---------
3^5 243
3^6 729
3^7 2187
3^8 6561 --------- and so on ...see the pattern of 3, 9, 7 , 1 in the units digit.

So A is sufficient and is the answer.

If x > 4 then units digit can be anything. SO can not conclusively say that divisible by 10.
Join the discussion

by prsnt11 » Sun May 01, 2011 12:15 am
For the remainder to be 0, the units digit of x needs to be 3, which will also mean that x needs to be ODD. Only then 3x + 1 will be divisible by 10.
(1): x = 2( 2n + 1). Hence x must be even. Hence x CANNOT be 3 or have unit's digit as 3. So the answer is definitely NO.
(2): x > 4 => x can be even or odd. Hence x MAY have a unit's digit of 3. So the answer is MAYBE.
Hence A is the correct answer.
Join the discussion