Dissipating by?

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 6:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

Dissipating by?

by Katy_ » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:46 am
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances,prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result ofboundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different
temperatures and densities.

A. prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of
B. prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
C. its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
D. its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
E preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

OA is C

Could anyone please explain to me why "dissipating by" is accepted here? I can't get the usage of "dissipate" here :(

Thanks!
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:03 am
Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

A. prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a
result of
B. prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
C. its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
D. its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
E preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by
Generally, COMMA + VERBed refers to the immediately preceding noun.
Thus, in A and B, prevented seems to modify distances.
Since it is not the distances but the ACOUSTIC ENERGY that is prevented from dissipating, eliminate A and B.

Generally, COMMA + VERBing refers to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause.
Thus, in E, preventing seems to modify SOUND, implying that the sound is preventing its own energy from dissipating.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate E.

In D, as a result of boundaries implies that the boundaries themselves are RESULTING in something.
Not possible; only an ACTION or an EVENT can result in something.
Eliminate D.

The correct answer is C.
Katy_ wrote:Could anyone please explain to me why "dissipating by" is accepted here? I can't get the usage of "dissipate" here :(
OA: its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean
Here, dissipating is a GERUND: a verb serving as a NOUN.
More specifically, dissipating serves as the object of the preposition from.
From what action is the energy prevented?
The energy is prevented from DISSIPATING.
By boundaries serves to express that BOUNDARIES IN THE OCEAN prevent the energy from dissipating.
What prevents the energy from dissipating?
The energy is prevented from dissipating BY BOUNDARIES IN THE OCEAN.

The entire phrase its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by boundaries in the ocean is an absolute phrase.
For a description of this grammatical construction, check my posts here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/sir-joseph-t59644-15.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 6:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Katy_ » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:45 am
thank you very much! Your explanation is very clear :)

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 6:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Katy_ » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:47 am
thank you very much! Your explanation is very clear :)

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 1:24 am

by victory » Thu Dec 29, 2016 8:35 am
no,
do-ed or adjective phrase can refer to subject of main clause. the following is from gmatprep
seven persons are killed by sharks this year,fewer than have been killed...

so, the reason that do-ed can not refer to "sound" is not justified.

pls, explain more

• Page 1 of 1