BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

New techniques in thermal-scanning

Expert replies

by clock60 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:18 am
hi guys
amazing discussion
Atul, thanks for providing solution
oa is C
Join the discussion

by force5 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 11:50 am
i want to know the reason behind ruling out B. i don't see a reason to use present perfect in C. The tense usage in B is better. The only problem i can see in B is the construct and the positioning of the comparer (than)..... but is that a sufficient reason..???
Join the discussion

by kvitkod » Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:44 pm
kvitkod wrote:

this is an example of the ONLY pronoun that is allowed to go without standing for a noun.

THE ONLY PRONOUN ON THE GMAT THAT DON'T HAVE TO STAND FOR NOUNS:

It + description + that + complete sentence (independent clause)
It + description + to + verb (infinitive)

these "it"s DO NOT have to stand for nouns.
ALL other gmat pronouns must stand for nouns.
Atulmangal, thank you, nice explanation
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Wed Apr 13, 2011 2:13 pm
clock60 wrote:New techniques in thermal-scanning photography, a process that records radiation from surface areas, makes it possible to study the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river in greater detail than ever before.
a. makes it possible to study the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river in greater detail than ever before

b. make it possible to study, in greater detail, the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river than ever before

c. have made it possible to study in greater detail than ever before the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river

d. make possible the study of the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river in greater detail than it ever was before

e. has made it more possible than ever before to study in greater detail the effects of calefaction, or warming, of a river

guys please share your ideas about B vs C
source Gprep
It's not a tense issue, people. The present simple "make" bestows a 'general', something that is true meaning on the sentence (think "the earth rotates around its axis), while the present perfect 'have made' indicates that the techniques have recently made this possible without specifying when exactly. In the absence of context, both present perfect and present simple are viable options for this sentence.

The real issue with B is the mis-location of the comparison "than ever before". Generally speaking, things should be close to the things they talk about / refer to / modify. C uses the right form, as it first completes the comparison "study in greater detail than ever before", then moves on to talk about what exactly it is possible to study.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Apr 14, 2011 2:44 am
i received a private message regarding this problem.

first, note that this problem is not from GMAT PREP -- a quick internet search reveals that it is from the old ETS paper exams, and that it has also apparently been lifted by "1000sc".

the fatal flaw in choice (b) is its needlessly splitting the modifier "in greater detail than ever before". i can't see any reason to split this modifier in the first place -- i.e., i can't think of any constructions that could be legitimately inserted into it -- but the comma placed after "in greater detail" is especially heinous. that comma totally changes the meaning, because the sentence is now basically just saying "in greater detail", rather than saying "in greater detail than ever before" as it's supposed to.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by force5 » Thu Apr 14, 2011 3:06 am
@Ron and Geva thanks for the explanation. It makes sense now. Really appreciate it.
thanks for the post clock.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:38 am
lunarpower wrote:i received a private message regarding this problem.

first, note that this problem is not from GMAT PREP -- a quick internet search reveals that it is from the old ETS paper exams, and that it has also apparently been lifted by "1000sc".

the fatal flaw in choice (b) is its needlessly splitting the modifier "in greater detail than ever before". i can't see any reason to split this modifier in the first place -- i.e., i can't think of any constructions that could be legitimately inserted into it -- but the comma placed after "in greater detail" is especially heinous. that comma totally changes the meaning, because the sentence is now basically just saying "in greater detail", rather than saying "in greater detail than ever before" as it's supposed to.
Hi Ron , Then what does "than ever before : at the end of B signify ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by badresh70 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:19 am
IMO :C
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Jun 15, 2011 12:52 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
lunarpower wrote:i received a private message regarding this problem.

first, note that this problem is not from GMAT PREP -- a quick internet search reveals that it is from the old ETS paper exams, and that it has also apparently been lifted by "1000sc".

the fatal flaw in choice (b) is its needlessly splitting the modifier "in greater detail than ever before". i can't see any reason to split this modifier in the first place -- i.e., i can't think of any constructions that could be legitimately inserted into it -- but the comma placed after "in greater detail" is especially heinous. that comma totally changes the meaning, because the sentence is now basically just saying "in greater detail", rather than saying "in greater detail than ever before" as it's supposed to.
Hi Ron , Then what does "than ever before : at the end of B signify ?
it doesn't really signify anything -- it's in a position that makes it nonsense.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion