BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision

by aspirant2011 » Thu May 19, 2011 10:10 am
A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying it would have to be used if the standard of umpiring keeps going down

A. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday by backing the controversial innovation and saying
B. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the controversial innovation was backed by the football team captain when he did a volte-face on Thursday saying that
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that
D. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain had a volte-face on Thursday and is backing the controversial innovation by saying that
E. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and has now decided to back the controversial innovation when he said that

[spoiler]OA: Don't you guys think that "captain did something by something" is the correct usage. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:5 members

by Target2009 » Thu May 19, 2011 11:34 am
Original Sentence looks okay to me.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:5 members

by amar66 » Thu May 19, 2011 12:10 pm
IMO C

A)Avoid -ing as much as possible. Moreover, "backing" & "saying" are not two separate tasks done by the captain. He is doing single task that is volte-face & that too by saying something. He proved his "backing" by "saying" in favor of UDRS. So don't need to break backing & saying into two separate clauses.
b)misplaced modifier
d)"had": wrong use of possessive
e)awkward, bad construction
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:39 pm
Location: Singapore
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members

by abhi0697 » Fri May 20, 2011 7:05 am
I will go with C
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri May 20, 2011 12:06 pm
IMO A

Volte-face is a total change of position, as in policy or opinion.

Op A

the football team captain did a volte face on Thursday

by backing the controversial innovation and

by saying bla bla bla

Op C

the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and
the football team captain backed the controversial innovation saying


Logically Op A seems good to me....IMO A
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:43 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by cyrwr1 » Fri May 20, 2011 1:11 pm
IMO C

Rephrase it as:

A critic of this rule, he changed his position on Thursday and supported the rule, saying that....

changed his position and supported are parallel---->> did and backed parallel (proved it by "saying that")

This is much better than " the player changed his position by supporting.... and saying...."
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Fri May 20, 2011 10:38 pm
hi guys
i also torn between A and C
but finally picked C
in A , i think, we need second preposition before saying
to be || it must be,
a ..critic did a volte-face....by backing.... and by saying. Gmat very rare omits prepositions
in case of grammer C looks for me better, but logically A is closer to me in meaning
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sat May 21, 2011 1:53 am
Hi,
IMO C
cywr1 has already pointed it out rightly

Cheers!
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat May 21, 2011 3:35 am
C. A staunch critic of the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS), the football team captain did a volte-face on Thursday and backed the controversial innovation saying that

It seems as if the innovation were saying something
why is A wrong ? I choose A . I choose to side with the weak
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat May 21, 2011 3:38 am
amar66 wrote:IMO C

A)Avoid -ing as much as possible. Moreover, "backing" & "saying" are not two separate tasks done by the captain. He is doing single task that is volte-face & that too by saying something. He proved his "backing" by "saying" in favor of UDRS. So don't need to break backing & saying into two separate clauses.
b)misplaced modifier
d)"had": wrong use of possessive
e)awkward, bad construction
Hi amar how do u know whether the captiain did not do anything else to back the innovation
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sat May 21, 2011 6:00 am
The use of 'and' in A, incorrectly signifies that both 'backing' and 'saying' are equally important and more importantly, that they could be mutually exclusive whereas the two are actually related in the sense that one is causing the other.
Because, the statement is in reported speech, I thought usage of 'that' after 'saying' in C makes it even better.
So, I chose 'C'
Probably, usage of 'by' before 'saying' in C would have made this absolutely clear.
Expert comments on this plz.

Cheers!
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Sat May 21, 2011 10:46 am
I also would choose C, for reasoning similar to Frankenstein. The implication is that he backed the innovation BY saying it would have to be used. Though parallel, "by backing...and saying..." implies they are 2 different things, which in context they are not.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:48 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:3 members

by gmatdriller » Sat May 21, 2011 12:31 pm
All the options but B used the right introductory modifier-
"the captain of the team."
A: "backing" and "saying" suggests different independent actions
C: David did a volte-face and backed ... saying that
D: had: David neither posses a "volte-face" nor "did" a volte-face before
some other event in the past.
E: says "David did a volte-face and has now decided to back..." wordy and redundant

Option C seems better than A.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat May 21, 2011 1:58 pm
first, i wouldn't worry much about this question -- it's from an author who is apparently so unfamiliar with the test that he/she doesn't even know the most basic facts about how these questions are formatted. (specifically, the underlines all start with the same words; this NEVER happens on official problems, on which the underline ALWAYS starts at the first difference and ends at the last difference).

(a) is fine.
(c) would be fine if a comma were added before the -ING modifier. we need the -ING modifier to modify the previous clause, a type of modification that calls for a comma.
VivianKerr wrote:I also would choose C, for reasoning similar to Frankenstein. The implication is that he backed the innovation BY saying it would have to be used. Though parallel, "by backing...and saying..." implies they are 2 different things, which in context they are not.
i hear you here, but this isn't necessarily true; the context is not specific enough to allow us to make this determination for sure.
i.e., BOTH contexts are possible:
(a) the person backed the innovation in some other way (i.e., by justifying it in terms of rules/logic), AND THEN said that it would have to be used.
(c) the person backed the innovation by actually saying that it would have to be used.

both meanings are fine.
on balance, then, the original (a) is the best choice -- although the gmat is not going to have an answer choice like (c). i.e., the gmat is not going to contain answer choices that are only wrong in terms of punctuation.
Last edited by lunarpower on Tue May 24, 2011 5:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:5 members

by amar66 » Sat May 21, 2011 5:28 pm
Thank you Ron...!!!
Top
Post new topic Locked