BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

subgroup modifier

Expert replies
by paes » Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:27 am
Mgmat (Page-236) is giving following examples to modify a subgroup :

(i) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of which were only recently discovered.

(ii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of them only recently discovered.

(iii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some only recently discovered.


Can somebody explain me why 'were' is used for (i) not for (ii)/(iii)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by paes » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:27 pm
can somebody plz explain the above usages ?
Join the discussion

by lilisanei » Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:53 pm
paes wrote:Mgmat (Page-236) is giving following examples to modify a subgroup :

(i) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of which were only recently discovered.

(ii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of them only recently discovered.

(iii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some only recently discovered.


Can somebody explain me why 'were' is used for (i) not for (ii)/(iii)

I am looking for the answer too. Can some one explain please.
Join the discussion

by Jim@Grockit » Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:38 am
paes wrote:Mgmat (Page-236) is giving following examples to modify a subgroup :

(i) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of which were only recently discovered.

(ii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some of them only recently discovered.

(iii) This model explains all known subatomic particles, some only recently discovered.


Can somebody explain me why 'were' is used for (i) not for (ii)/(iii)
"Which" is a relative pronoun, which generates a relative clause with its own verb (like in this very sentence). The others do not have a relative pronoun.
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:37 am
I think if we use were in ii and iii, we would have run on sentences, as the part after the comma would become independent clauses.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1