BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

conclusion

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

conclusion

by confuse mind » Sat May 05, 2012 10:01 pm
What is the conclusion in the following argument?
Secondly, is it a valid/invalid conclusion?

The recent boom in new home construction has finally begun to taper off. Developers are not buying land, contractors are finding themselves going without work for longer periods, and banks are issuing fewer mortgages. People must not be as interested in buying new homes as they were even six months ago.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:17 am

by chandan.mnnit » Sat May 05, 2012 10:25 pm
confuse mind wrote:What is the conclusion in the following argument?
Secondly, is it a valid/invalid conclusion?

The recent boom in new home construction has finally begun to taper off. Developers are not buying land, contractors are finding themselves going without work for longer periods, and banks are issuing fewer mortgages. People must not be as interested in buying new homes as they were even six months ago.
The conclusion given in the argument is that "People are not interested in buying homes as they were 6 months ago"
The conclusion is faulty as the premise of the argument does not state abt the status of the flats available for sale. Probably the developers are not starting any new projects as they already have a lot of projects they are not completely sold. And that maybe the people are buying the already constructed projects. The argument does not shed any light on this relationship and hence is faulty.
Hope it helps.
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:26 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Thiagaraj » Mon May 07, 2012 9:38 pm
I feel there are two conclusions here. One would be "The recent boom in new home construction has finally begun to taper off", for which the premises given are the subsequent two lines. However, the last line, "People must not be as interested in buying new homes as they were even six months ago." could pass off for an inference or a conclusion.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Tue May 08, 2012 8:49 am
Conclusion: People must not be as interested in buying new homes as they were even six months ago.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

by confuse mind » Tue May 08, 2012 10:15 am
Experts, what say?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:55 pm
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by veenu08 » Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:32 am
confuse mind wrote:What is the conclusion in the following argument?
Secondly, is it a valid/invalid conclusion?

The recent boom in new home construction has finally begun to taper off. Developers are not buying land, contractors are finding themselves going without work for longer periods, and banks are issuing fewer mortgages. People must not be as interested in buying new homes as they were even six months ago.
Can someone please explain this?
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1