BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT: Analyze Arg Structure (Political Analyst)

Expert replies
by K85 » Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:50 am
I ran into questions yesterday on the MGMAT CAT1 yesterday that I hadn't really seen before in studying for the GMAT. Do these show up on the actual test? (Granted, there were only two of them on the practice CAT). I don't recall seeing one like this on the GMATPrep software.

Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?

A. The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.
B. The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.
C. The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.
D. The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.
E. The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cramya » Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:02 pm
I would go with B even though C looks quite attractive.

It quite possible to see these questions on the real thing(may be 1 or 2). There are a few on GMAT prep also. It just depends on our luck I guess...

The first bolded argument is referring to the private sphere of things and the second bolded part to the public sphere of things. The analysts says" A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere"

The first bolded part that says the private sphere incentives have been tried but has not produced any results but yet the analyst continues to favor these incentives in the private sphere of things
Join the discussion

by kirvar » Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:03 pm
IMO B

I believe C is not correct. The first statement doesn't contradict the second. It contradicts the alternative proposal.
Join the discussion

by K85 » Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:16 pm
Thank you guys both for your help. I was hoping I could ignore this style of question, but I guess not :)

Answer below...(from MGMAT)

[spoiler]The analyst recounts a proposal by the Russian government to increase the Russian population. The analyst then dismisses that proposal and makes a counterproposal that he or she then supports with hypothetical scenarios. The claim that the counterproposal (to try good governance) is preferable is the conclusion of the argument.

(A) This choice is incorrect. The first boldface is a fact that indicates the government plan has failed before; it is not the conclusion of the argument. However, the second is a premise in support of the argument’s proposal.

(B) CORRECT. The first is the fact that the government plan has "been tried before, to no avail," a fact that undermines the alternative proposal made by the government. The author's proposal is to improve the country's governance, and the second boldface supports that plan by showing one way in which better governance might lead to a population increase.

(C) The first does not contradict the argument’s conclusion that improved governance will reverse the decline in population. Rather, it undermines the other proposal presented by the government, which is a claim that the argument does not support. The second is not the argument’s main point, but an assertion that supports the conclusion of the argument by showing one way in which better governance might lead to a population increase.

(D) The first is a premise that the government plan has "been tried before, to an avail," which weighs against the preceding proposal. The second is not the proposal that the first directly supports, but an assertion that supports the conclusion of the argument by showing one way in which better governance might lead to a population increase.

(E) The first is not a conclusion at all, rather a factual premise that these measures "have been tried before, to little avail." The second boldface does not oppose the first boldface, rather it is an assertion that supports the conclusion of the argument by showing one way in which better governance might lead to a population increase.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sun May 15, 2016 1:58 am
i think it should be answer B
Join the discussion