GMAT Prep vs. Actual score discrepancy

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:39 pm

GMAT Prep vs. Actual score discrepancy

by scotsg » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:59 pm
...so fter preparing for the gmat for about 100 hours in 4 weeks, I put up a 570 (56th percentile overall) with a 35Q and 34V.

The frustrating part is that on GMAT prep (supposedly the most accurate scoring system) I scored a 650 about one week into my prep and a 680 at the end of my prep. I also scored a 600 on Princeton Review's diagnostic test before I started preparing.

How can I explain this huge gap? I feel like I may have panicked a bit on the actual test, but to drop 110 points in a couple days is a huge bummer. Did I panic more than I thought, or is it normal/possible to have a 110 gap in the GMATPrep vs the actual test?

One other thought is that it seems that with the bad economy and layoffs, more people and smarter people are taking the GMAT, and the GMATPrep stats are lagged, whereas the actual GMAT reflects this "current" and "smarter" group. Consequently, I'm competing against a GMAT test taker group which is stronger than it was say a few years ago. Any credence to this view, or is this just another GMAT myth?

I am scheduled to take the test again in a month. I'd like to hit that 680, and I feel like I have a good handle on the basics of Q and V. Any other recommendations?

THANKS!
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Thanked: 113 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:710

by dmateer25 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:43 pm
It is possible that the discrepancy could be 110 points. The Standard deviation for the GMATPrep is +-30 points I believe. I have a few questions about your test experience.

1) Did you do both AWA essays with your GMATPreps?
2) How uncomfortable were you when you took the test? Were you anxious?
3) What were your quant scores on the GMATPrep? It seems like you struggled in quant.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:39 pm

by scotsg » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:42 pm
Thanks for the insight.

I guess if +-30 is correct, that means that it would be a greater than 3 standard deviation event for me to score a 570, right? Basically, a 2.5ish% chance that I score as low as I did. This is what leads me to believe, or at least hope, something other than my knowledge base could have caused the lower than expected score.

1.) Yes, I did both AWAs on the GMAT Preps. On the actual exam, I got a 6 or 90th percentile score on them. I honestly felt like I did expend a lot of brainpower on these on test day. While I knew I likely did well here, I felt mentally fatigued after this session. In retrospect, this section was probably much easier than I had anticipated (whereas the math was much harder).

2.) Aside from feeling a bit fatigued, I felt good after the AWA, and I believe the math section started fine, as I hit a probability question around #8 or so. However, I made some blind guesses midway through (a no-no, I know) becuase I felt rushed. On practice exams, I rarely did this. Furthermore, there were very few math questions where I was very satisfied with my answer; whereas on the math practice exams, I could at least narrow it down to 2 choices most of the time and could usually tell when I had an answer correct. Toward the end of math, it seemed like I hand't been asked as many geometry, combination, permutation, or probability questions as I was expecting, which phased me. While I didn't acknowledge it fully in the break between math and verbal, I somehow knew not to expect hitting 680. When beginning Verbal, the test seemed like it was taking much longer than a practice session. At that point I was anxious to be done. However, my time management here wasn't the best and I had about 6 minutes for the last 6 questions. I believe RC went poorly (this is my weakest verbal section). However, I believe CR and SC went about as expected.

3.) My math scores (I believe) were 41 and 45 on quant practice tests. So I'm definitely weaker in math, but these scores are still much better than the 35 I mustered on test day.

As a bit more context, I was using the scoring grid from GMAT's 11th edition on my pretests. In verbal I was between 70 and 90 percentiles, and for math 55 - 80. This is partly why I'm so surprised - I didn't even hit the bottom of my personal range in either section.

Sorry if this isn't the most straightforward, but I appreciate any thoughtful insight or recommendations! Thanks again.