official Question from GMAT Prep

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Thanked: 205 times
Followed by:24 members

by GMATinsight » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:28 pm
As per the definition of the question

h(100) = 2 x 4 x 6 x 8 x 10 x 12 x 14 ... and so on...98 x 100 (Total 50 terms)

=> h(100) = 2^50 (1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10......and so on...x 48 x 49 x 50)

This means h(100) is multiple of all prime numbers between 1 and 50

therefore h(100)+1 will leave a remainder of 1 when divided by any prime number from 1 to 50

therefore, p, which is a factor of h(100)+1, will certainly be greater than a prime numbers greater than 50

Hence, "p" must be greater than 40 as per the following options

Option - E
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:58 pm
HI prachi18oct,

This question is built around a Number Property that most people don't know. I'll show you some examples of the Number Property before I define what it is:

Other than the number 1....

None of the factors of 2 divide evenly into 3
None of the factors of 3 divide evenly into 4
None of the factors of 4 divide evenly into 5
None of the factors of 5 divide evenly into 6
....
None of the factors of 100 divide evenly into 101
...
None of the factors of 136 divide evenly into 137
Etc.

The Number Property is: When adding 1 to a number, NONE of the factors (other than 1) that divide evenly into the old number will divide evenly into the new number.
--------------------------------
This question asks us to consider a really big number: the product of every positive even integer from 2 to 100, inclusive. THEN it asks us to add 1 to that number. So, none of the numbers (other than 1) that divide evenly into the prior number will divide evenly into the new number. The largest "prime" number that divides evenly into the old number is 47 (it's found in 94, since 94 = 2 x 47); all primes smaller than 47 will also divide in. You can find them all the same way that you found the 47.

Thus, the smallest prime that will divide into this new, gigantic number MUST be greater than 47 (whatever it actually is).

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:29 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by confused13 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:36 am
Rich one question,

not knowing this property (it seems to me that this property is very rarely used), how could I solve this question?

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:19 am
Hi confused13,

As a general rule, Quant questions are almost always based on a pattern of some kind (math formula, math rule, Number Property, etc.). If you can't immediately deduce a pattern, then you might have to "play around" a bit with the question to try to deduce what the pattern is. In the broad sense, it's critical thinking: here's a weird situation; what can I do to figure it out?

Based on the description of the function in the prompt, we can run some "TESTS" to try to figure things out....

The H(n) is the product of all the even integers from 2 to n, inclusive.

So....
H(4) = 2x4 = 8
The prime factors of 8 are (2)(2)(2)
If we do H(4) + 1 = 9, then the prime factors are (3)(3)
NOTICE how NONE of the prime factors of 8 are in 9? That's interesting....

H(6) = 2x4x6 = 48
The prime factors of 48 are (2)(2)(2)(2)(3)
If we do H(6) + 1 = 49, then the prime factors are (7)(7)
NOTICE how NONE of the prime factors of 48 are in 49? That's interesting....and probably a pattern, since it's happened TWICE NOW.

From here, I'd have to deduce that this pattern holds true. With H(100), I know that there are LOTS of primes that go in (the largest of which is 47, which can be "found" in 94). I have to assume that NONE of them will go into H(100) + 1. Thus, the smallest prime would have to be greater than 47. The question doesn't actually ask us for the exact answer though (the answer choices are "ranges").

The takeaway from all of this is that you shouldn't be afraid to "play" with a question a bit. In the end, you don't have to be a brilliant mathematician to answer this question, but you're also not allowed to just stare at it either.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am
For every positive even integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, the p is

A: Between 2 & 10
B: Between 10 & 20
C: Between 20 & 30
D: Between 30 & 40
E: Greater than 40
Important Concept: If integer k is greater than 1, and k is a factor (divisor) of N, then k is not a divisor of N+1
For example, since 7 is a factor of 350, we know that 7 is not a factor of (350+1)
Similarly, since 8 is a factor of 312, we know that 8 is not a factor of 313

Now let's examine h(100)
h(100) = (2)(4)(6)(8)....(96)(98)(100)
= (2x1)(2x2)(2x3)(2x4)....(2x48)(2x49)(2x50)
Factor out all of the 2's to get: h(100) = [2^50][(1)(2)(3)(4)....(48)(49)(50)]

Since 2 is in the product of h(100), we know that 2 is a factor of h(100), which means that 2 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 3 is in the product of h(100), we know that 3 is a factor of h(100), which means that 3 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 5 is in the product of h(100), we know that 5 is a factor of h(100), which means that 5 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

.
.
.
.
Similarly, since 47 is in the product of h(100), we know that 47 is a factor of h(100), which means that 47 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

So, we can see that none of the primes from 2 to 47 can be factors of h(100)+1, which means the smallest prime factor of h(100)+1 must be greater than 47.

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image