GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 - Tough Geometry

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:40 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 186 times
Followed by:29 members

by aneesh.kg » Thu May 31, 2012 2:41 am
sui generis wrote:Sorry for posting a image file as i couldn't find the text anywhere.

Could anyone please solve it mathematically. No idea how to approach.


Thanks
Image
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu May 31, 2012 2:44 am
A rectangle is inscribed in a circle of radius r. If the rectangle is not a square, which of the following could be equal to the perimeter of the rectangle?

A. 2r(√3)
B. 2r(√3 + 1)
C. 4r(√2)
D. 4r(√3)
E. 4r(√3 + 1)
When shapes overlap, look for what they have IN COMMON.
When a rectangle is inscribed in a circle, the DIAGONAL of the rectangle is also the DIAMETER of the circle.

Almost every answer choice here includes √3.
√3 implies a 30-60-90 triangle.
The sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in the following ratio:
1 - √3 - 2.

Let r=1, implying a diameter of 2.
Draw the following figure:

Image

The perimeter of the rectangle above = 2 + 2√3. This is our target.
Now we plug r=1 into the answers to see whether one of them yields our target of 2 + 2√3.

Answer choice B:
2r(√3 + 1) = 2(1)(√3 + 1) = 2√3 + 2.
Success!

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by sui generis » Thu May 31, 2012 2:49 am
Awesome solutions guys. Learnt a new concept today.

Thanks Aneesh and Mitch.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by sui generis » Thu May 31, 2012 2:50 am
Awesome solutions guys. Learnt a new concept today.

Thanks Aneesh and Mitch.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:11 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:7 members

by tutorphd » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:05 pm
The solutions above obtained the right answer by guessing there is 30-60-90 triangle involved. That is a good approach for a COULD BE problem because once you found an answer that works, it is the answer.

On the other hand, it remained unclear why the other answers do not work. This is actually an optimization problem in disguise. The perimeter of the rectangle has a range between two extremal values:

The first extreme case is when one of the sides is completely squashed into a dot (side a = 0, side b = 2r), which gives a perimeter p = 4r.

The other extreme case is when the other side is completely squashed into a dot (side a = 2r, side b = 0), giving the same extremal value of p = 4r.

Changing the rectangle by increasing one side and decreasing the other changed the perimeter from 4r to 4r. Somewhere in between, there must be another extremal value. By symmetry it happens exactly when the rectangle is a square (side a = b = r*root(2)), giving a perimeter of r*root(2)*4.

The bottom line is the perimeter is between 4r and 4r*root(2), with the lower limit corresponding to a rectangle squashed into a line, and the upper limit corresponding to a square. That excludes all the answers except one:

A. approximately 3.4r - too small, reject
B. approximately 5.4r - passes
C. this is the case of a square - excluded by the problem
D. too big - reject
E. too big - reject
Skype / Chicago quant tutor in GMAT / GRE
https://gmat.tutorchicago.org/