Need help on this parallelism question

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:10 members

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:38 am
very convoluted SC entry --> after its (pointing to the growth) initial slowing OR after it had slowed initially at least; we have not additional time indication, hence the 2nd quarter term is not too much help.
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:24 pm

by manjus_mailme » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:20 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!
Thanks for your explanation.Now I am clear about the answer choice.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:09 am
Thanked: 1 times

by crackthegmat2011 » Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:52 am
The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".

Is A still the correct answer choice ?

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:05 am
Thanked: 1 times

by msrrautela » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:00 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:Let's move the events to the present tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerates after slowing in the second quarter.

While the statement above might appear as a newspaper headline, it makes no sense and is grammatically incorrect. Clearly the two actions -- the saying and the accelerating -- are not happening at the same time. Thus, the verbs should not be in the same tense:

The announcement says that growth accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Ah, much better. Now the order of the actions is clear and makes sense.

When the time frame moves into the past, the same logic holds true. Since the two actions are not happening at the same time, different tenses are needed. The present tense verb says becomes the past tense verb said; the past tense verb accelerated becomes the past perfect tense verb had accelerated:

The announcement said that growth had accelerated after slowing in the second quarter.

Hope this helps!
Great insights! Thanks a lot! :)
It's a dawg eat dawg world!

Legendary Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:10 members

by Night reader » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:54 am
crackthegmat2011 wrote:The original sentence posted by "manjus_mailme" says "remain concerned" and not "remained concerned".

Is A still the correct answer choice ?
who cares OA is A!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:39 pm
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members

by zaarathelab » Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:00 am
GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:40 am
zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks
No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).

To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:30 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
zaarathelab wrote:GMATGURUNY, is HAD used only for the earliest event or can it be used to describe intermediary events as well ?

Also, shouldn't slowing be 'HAD SLOWED' since it is earlier than the 'HAD ACCELERATED' event?

Can we use it this way -

....... said that growth had accelerated after it had slowed....??

Pls clarify

Thanks
No. We cannot use the past perfect (had slowed) to express an action completed before another past perfect event (had accelerated).

To bypass the tense issue, the sentence says that growth had accelerated AFTER SLOWING. Because slowing is a gerund -- a verb functioning as a noun -- we don't have to worry about tense. The preposition after makes it clear that had accelerated took place AFTER slowing.
hey Mitch,
does this all discussion means that whenever we have to report sumthing such as " the editorial informed(past ) that blah blah (past perfect)...."
I am getting confused after dis SC question that the tense order needs to be maintained in these cases.

Please clarify