Knewton stars

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

Knewton stars

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:21 am
A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be observed more clearly than never before and stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly.
  • observed more clearly than never before and
    more than ever before clearly visible as
    more clearly observed than ever before and that
    more clearly visible as never before while
    clearly observed more than ever before so
Explanation :-
This sentence contains two errors. First, the construction more... than never before is idiomatically incorrect The correct idiom is more ... than ever before. In addition, there is an error in parallel construction. Because the engineers make two claims, and the first is introduced by that (that the machine will allow.), the second claim about stargazers, must also be introduced by that. Without the that, the sentence is a run-on, because two independent clauses are connected by the conjunction and with no comma.

Choice B fixes the idiomatic error, but jumbles the word order illogically and incorrectly introduces the second clause with as.

Choice C corrects the idiomatic error, and correctly introduces the second clause with that (creating parallelism).

Choice D fails to correct the idiomatic error.

Choice E fixes the idiomatic error. However, it also uses uses so to incorrectly convey that the second clause is a result of the first, and the sentence lacks parallelism because the second clause still fails to be introduced by that. Additionally, this option changes the meaning of the sentence by stating that the the night sky will be clearly observed more -- that the sky will be observed with greater frequency. The original states that the sky will be observed more clearly, or that the sky will be observed with a better resolution.

What if E had been
more clearly observed than ever before so , would it have been correct
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:10 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be observed more clearly than never before and stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly.
  • observed more clearly than never before and
    more than ever before clearly visible as
    more clearly observed than ever before and that
    more clearly visible as never before while
    clearly observed more than ever before so
Explanation :-
This sentence contains two errors. First, the construction more... than never before is idiomatically incorrect The correct idiom is more ... than ever before. In addition, there is an error in parallel construction. Because the engineers make two claims, and the first is introduced by that (that the machine will allow.), the second claim about stargazers, must also be introduced by that. Without the that, the sentence is a run-on, because two independent clauses are connected by the conjunction and with no comma.

Choice B fixes the idiomatic error, but jumbles the word order illogically and incorrectly introduces the second clause with as.

Choice C corrects the idiomatic error, and correctly introduces the second clause with that (creating parallelism).

Choice D fails to correct the idiomatic error.

Choice E fixes the idiomatic error. However, it also uses uses so to incorrectly convey that the second clause is a result of the first, and the sentence lacks parallelism because the second clause still fails to be introduced by that. Additionally, this option changes the meaning of the sentence by stating that the the night sky will be clearly observed more -- that the sky will be observed with greater frequency. The original states that the sky will be observed more clearly, or that the sky will be observed with a better resolution.

What if E had been
more clearly observed than ever before so , would it have been correct
I don't feel that your option E will have been correct because of two reasons-

1. Construction end's in so........so what??? --------awkward
2. Construction is not parallel because we require second that to list the second item

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:14 am
why are you presuming that we need parallelism .
Take it as a cause and effect structure
so "stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly"

A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be more clearly observed than ever before so stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:21 am
mundasingh123 wrote:why are you presuming that we need parallelism .
Take it as a cause and effect structure
so "stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly"

A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be more clearly observed than ever before so stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly
A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be more clearly observed than ever before so stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly --------> so should have been preceded by a comma and what about the idiom because in your sentence there occurs no idiom either so x that y or so x as to be y.......moreover I feel that we need a cordinating conjunction and after ever before..............so is basically used for giving reasons but if we consider the meaning of the above sentence then sentence doesn't seem to give any reason, it is just talking about the things which will be able to happen because of this new telescope..........

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:40 am
aspirant2011 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:why are you presuming that we need parallelism .
Take it as a cause and effect structure
so "stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly"

A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be more clearly observed than ever before so stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly

A new telescope scheduled for completion in 2012 is greatly anticipated by astronomy enthusiasts because engineers claim that the machine will allow the night sky to be more clearly observed than ever before so stargazers using the telescope will be able to see constellations that cannot presently be observed- almost perfectly --------> so should have been preceded by a comma and what about the idiom because in your sentence there occurs no idiom either so x that y or so x as to be y.......moreover I feel that we need a cordinating conjunction and after ever before..............so is basically used for giving reasons but if we consider the meaning of the above sentence then sentence doesn't seem to give any reason, it is just talking about the things which will be able to happen because of this new telescope..........
so should have been preceded by a comma

This is the FANBOYS coordination conjunction you are talking about
This is different from the SO in the IDIOM So that / so as to be
and what about the idiom because in your sentence there occurs no idiom either so x that y or so x as to be y.......
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:43 am
BUT Gmat doesnt test punctuation , so U never Know
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

• Page 1 of 1