BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG #79

Expert replies
by Reft » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can buy the same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost of the computer great in State A than in State B?

(1) t1 > t2

(2) p1t1 > p2t2

OA: E


I approached this problem by substituting easy to work with numbers, and seemed to come up with the wrong answer. Apparently, even though substituting numbers works for one of the statements, the actual answer is found by trying to determine if p1(1+t1/0) is greater than p2(1 +t2/100)

What do those equations even mean? I'm so lost.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:45 pm
We need to find whether p1(1 + t1/100) > p2(1 + t2/100) or p1(100 + t1) > p2(100 + t2)?
or 100.p1 + p1.t1 > 100.p2 + p2.t2 implies 100(p1 - p2) + (p1.t1 - p2.t2) > 0 ?

(1) t1 > t2 does not imply if 100(p1 - p2) + (p1.t1 - p2.t2) > 0 or not.
So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) p1.t1 > p2.t2 implies (p1.t1 - p2.t2) will be a positive value. But again we don't know whether (p1 - p2) is positive or negative.
So, (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2) also we cannot determine whether 100(p1 - p2) + (p1.t1 - p2.t2) > 0 or not.

[spoiler]The correct answer is (E).[/spoiler]
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:14 pm
I understand why you could get lost here. It's important to look at the question they ask in order to solve ALL DS questions.

They want to know, is the TOTAL cost greater in state A than in state B. Let's write that as an equation.

Before we do that, let's understand the following:

The total cost of a computer is it's pre-tax cost + it's pre-tax cost*tax rate.

For example a computer that costs $100 pre-tax at a 6% tax rate will cost $100 + .06*100=$106.

An easier way to think of that equation is as follows

Total cost with tax of a computer= (pre-tax cost)(1+tax rate).

With our example above, we would find that the total cost with tax = 100*(1+.06) = 100*(1.06) = $106

So with that in mind let's write the equation to the question posed, is the total cost of the computer greater in A or B?

Total Cost of A= p1(1+t1/100)
Total Cost of B= p2(1+t2/100)

So is p1(1+t1/100) > p2(1+t2/100)? This is the expression that is equivalent to the question.

Now let's go through the problem:

If t1>t2 is the total cost of the computer great in State A than in State B?

This cannot be determined. If the tax rate (t1) for State A is 10% and the tax rate (t2) for State B is 0% and the computers pre-tax cost is the same, then State A > B. But let's say that pre-tax A costs (p1) $100 and B costs (p2) $200, then the tax rate of State A isn't high enough to make A > B. Thus, Statement (1) is not sufficient.

Statement (2)
We have the same problem as statement one. Just because pre-tax cost of A is > than pre-tax cost of B doesn't mean that the total cost will be more. If the tax rate is 0% in both states A>B but let's say the computer in State A has a pre-tax of 100 and State B has a pre-tax cost of 99. If State A has no sales tax and B has a 50% tax rate, then B>A. The statement isn't strong enough to answer the question.

TAKEN TOGETHER:

If the pre-tax cost of the computer in A AND its tax rate are greater than BOTH the pre-tax cost and the tax rate of B then it's impossible to have B>A. For example if A is $100 and 10% tax rate and B is $99 and a 9% tax rate then 100(1.1)>99*(1.09) so A must be greater than B at all times which answers the question is A>B.

Together we can solve. Answer is C.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion