Hi all,
Just throwing this out there. I'm curious as to how various "internationally reputable" schools (for instance, McGill University of Montreal, Canada ranked 95th on the FT list) are ranked so much lower on the majority of MBA rankings than other schools with far lower reputations. I would assume that reputation and prestige of the school's "brand" (irrespective of the MBA program itself) due to quality and reputation of the other faculties of the school would create a huge demand for that particular school's students, both from a prospective applicant and employer's point of view.
If the school's "brand reputation" attracts many quality student applicants, which produces many quality alumni around the world, which in turn produces many strong connections with recruiters internationally and thus excellent recruitment opportunities, why would that particular school's "ranking" and "MBA education quality" be so much lower than other, far less-well-known schools?
Thoughts?
Just throwing this out there. I'm curious as to how various "internationally reputable" schools (for instance, McGill University of Montreal, Canada ranked 95th on the FT list) are ranked so much lower on the majority of MBA rankings than other schools with far lower reputations. I would assume that reputation and prestige of the school's "brand" (irrespective of the MBA program itself) due to quality and reputation of the other faculties of the school would create a huge demand for that particular school's students, both from a prospective applicant and employer's point of view.
If the school's "brand reputation" attracts many quality student applicants, which produces many quality alumni around the world, which in turn produces many strong connections with recruiters internationally and thus excellent recruitment opportunities, why would that particular school's "ranking" and "MBA education quality" be so much lower than other, far less-well-known schools?
Thoughts?
