This problem is from MGMAT's equations book. I'd be v.grateful if someone could explain Manhattan's working out that I've posted below in the spoiler section. I've posted my confusion in capitals also.
If x and y are nonnegative integers and x + y = 25, what is x?
(1) 20x + 10y < 300
(2) 20x + 10y > 280
[spoiler]Ans. is= (C); both statements together are sufficient.
Manhattan explains this as: "first, we should note that since x and y must be positive integers, the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25. If we combine the above two statements together we get:
so 280 < 20x + 10y < 300 (we can substitute (25-x) for y)
so 280 < 20x + 10(25-x) < 300
so 30 < 10x < 50
so 3 < x < 5
since x must be an integer, x must equal 4."
I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MANHATTAN STATES THAT X AND Y MUST BE POSITIVE INTEGERS WHEN ZERO IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER. ALSO, IF WE SUBSTITUTE X AS 0 AND Y AS 25 INTO THE 20x + 10y > 280, WE GET 0 + 250 > 280, BUT HOW CAN 250 BE GREATER THAN 280?
Thanks
[/spoiler]
If x and y are nonnegative integers and x + y = 25, what is x?
(1) 20x + 10y < 300
(2) 20x + 10y > 280
[spoiler]Ans. is= (C); both statements together are sufficient.
Manhattan explains this as: "first, we should note that since x and y must be positive integers, the smallest possible value for 20x + 10y is 250, when x=0 and y=25. If we combine the above two statements together we get:
so 280 < 20x + 10y < 300 (we can substitute (25-x) for y)
so 280 < 20x + 10(25-x) < 300
so 30 < 10x < 50
so 3 < x < 5
since x must be an integer, x must equal 4."
I CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MANHATTAN STATES THAT X AND Y MUST BE POSITIVE INTEGERS WHEN ZERO IS NOT A POSITIVE INTEGER. ALSO, IF WE SUBSTITUTE X AS 0 AND Y AS 25 INTO THE 20x + 10y > 280, WE GET 0 + 250 > 280, BUT HOW CAN 250 BE GREATER THAN 280?
Thanks
[/spoiler]

















