BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

National Chain stores

Expert replies

by arora007 » Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:55 am
I guess nobody except you testluv could have got it right on the first attempt!!

I see ur perfect 800 score.....

I hope on test day by some divine way... I start getting these tough ones right...
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by hero » Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:32 am
Testluv wrote:
ssgmatter wrote:Thankyou TestLuv for the explanation....However I am still not convince with E... I mean it says the same thing as what A says that rest of the spending occurs thru mail order of national chain store...

please help me on this
Not quite! Pay close attention to the language of the choice.

Let's take a look at it again:
Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.
Does it matter whether most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores (that is, outside of store clothing sales) took place through mail order divisions of national department stores or mail order divisions of regional departement stores or on the street, etc.?

No, the sources or types of outside-of-store sales don't matter. That outside-of-store sales mostly come from outside-of-store sources of a certain type (mail order division of national dept. stores) doesn't matter any more than if outside-of-store sales mostly come from merchants peddling shirts in the street. We need the choice to say that revenues from these outside-of-store sources increased, regardless of the types of outside-of-store sources....and this choice does NOT tell us that revenues at these alternative sources increased!

Let me know, if you still have doubts, and I will try to explain again.
thank you for the explanation. your first post was helpful in addressing the type of question it was, but i was also still confusing A & E. this second explanation was very helpful. after demonstrating what the REAL paradox is, the answer choice was very clear and confident.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Sat Jul 17, 2010 1:57 pm
In E don't you think that 'Most of the clothing sales made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores' is irrelevant? Why should I be worried about how the sales made? I have eliminated E because I think mode of sales is an irrelevant point here to discuss.

Answer is obviously A
ssgmatter wrote:Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.

Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990

1. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.

2. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores

3. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.

4. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.

5. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.

Please explain with reasons....
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion