Quadratic equation

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:49 pm
Location: Gandhinagar
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:2 members

Quadratic equation

by shashank.ism » Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:50 am
A quadratic with integral coefficients has two distinct positive integers as roots, the sum of its coefficients is prime and it takes the value -55 for some integer. The sum of the roots is

A) 32
B) 20
C) 24
D) 36
E) None of these

[spoiler]Correct Answer: B[/spoiler]

Problem approach needed..
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:21 am
i dont understand the question... mainly "it takes the value -55 for some integer."
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pm
Thanked: 653 times
Followed by:252 members

by papgust » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:25 am
I pretty much doubt whether we will be tested with these concepts in GMAT.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:35 pm
surely hope not, but I think I just didn't understand the question... is this question from a GMAT book?
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:26 am
money9111 wrote:i dont understand the question... mainly "it takes the value -55 for some integer."
The question tells us that we have an equation in the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0
a, b and c are integers.
There are two different solutions to the equation, and these solutions are positive integers.
The sum a+b+c is a prime number.
There is some integer k such that ak^2 + bk + c = -55

Having said all of that, this question is totally out of scope, so you can focus your energies elsewhere.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:19 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by vscid » Sat Feb 13, 2010 1:03 pm
I think we really need to put that project of rating questions on fast track !!
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:21 am
Brent Hanneson wrote:
money9111 wrote:i dont understand the question... mainly "it takes the value -55 for some integer."
The question tells us that we have an equation in the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0
a, b and c are integers.
There are two different solutions to the equation, and these solutions are positive integers.
The sum a+b+c is a prime number.
There is some integer k such that ak^2 + bk + c = -55

Having said all of that, this question is totally out of scope, so you can focus your energies elsewhere.
Well Brent,
I think this is a challenge question which is only useful for brainstorming and for fun.It hopefully would not come on the GMAT.

As for money9111:-
i dont understand the question... mainly "it takes the value -55 for some integer."
It just means that the sum of the coefficients is a prime and it(it here means the quadratic eqn.) takes the value -55 when we take some integer x.
Now,a+b+c=prime no.
ax2 + bx + c =-55
In my case I would solve the question my plugging prime numbers.


On another note Brent,Is there any formal approach for solving the ques.[(Ex:-Elimination technique and by the use of SUM(-b/a) and PRODUCT(c/a) and the fact that both of them are integers]
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1275
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:13 pm
Location: Arabian Sea
Thanked: 125 times
Followed by:2 members

by ajith » Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:27 am
harsh.champ wrote:
In my case I would solve the question my plugging prime numbers.
Please illustrate, which you would not!
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
Followed by:6 members
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:50 am
ajith wrote:
harsh.champ wrote:
In my case I would solve the question my plugging prime numbers.
Please illustrate, which you would not!
Well,why would I not....[I had not written in detail since I was not very sure abt the approach.I tried to look for some properties on the net and found a Dirichlet Theorem that deals with ques. involving prime coefficients.I got confused and tried to solve it in my own way]
Anyways it goes like this:-the roots are two distinct +ve integers .
So,their sum and pdt both will be +ve.
Which means either c and a are both -ve.[b is +ve then]
or b is -ve [a and c are then positive]
Now, lets take the 1st prime no. 2.
a = 2 b= -1 c=+1
Now,I will look for x when the quadratic becomes -55.
Then,the next no...............So,this way the hit-and-trial goes on..


I found this a very long method and thus asked Brent if he has any formal method.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P