Distance Rate Time Problem

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: O-Town FL
Thanked: 1 times

Distance Rate Time Problem

by LifetimesofSC » Mon May 26, 2008 6:36 am
Two cyclists start biking from a trail’s start 3 hours apart. The second cyclist travels at 10 miles per hour and starts 3 hours after the first cyclist who is traveling at 6 miles per hour. How much time will pass before the second cyclist catches up with the first from the time the second cyclist started biking?


2 hours
4 ½ hours
5 ¾ hours
6 hours
7 ½ hours

I KNOW the Answer is 4.5 hrs (B). This is obtained by subtracting the miles difference 10-6=4 and taking the 6*3=18 and dividing by 4 = 4.5.

When I approach these types of questions I automatically create a chart. When I create a chart using this question I get the wrong answer. Please advise on a proper set up.

Thanks in advance
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:55 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:750+

by VP_Tatiana » Tue May 27, 2008 7:05 pm
Here's an algebraic approach:

We know the good 'ole formula d = rt (distance equals rate times time). This is a good time to use that one.

Here are our variables:

d = distance the cyclists have traveled at the point cyclist 2 passes cyclist 1
r1 = rate of cyclist 1
r2 = rate of cyclist 2
t1 = time that cyclist 1 rides
t2 = time that cyclist 2 rides

Here are the formulas we can infer from the problem statement:
d = r1*t1
d = r2*t2
t1 = t2 + 3 hrs

Let's set the first two equations equal. This gives us:

r1*t1 = r2*t2

Plugging in the numbers from the problem statement as well as the third formula, I get:

6 mi/hr (t2 + 3 hr) = 10 mi/hr * t2

Multiplying I get:

(6 mi/hr * t2) + 18 mi = 10 mi/hr * t2
18 mi = 4 mi/hr * t2
18 mi/(4 mi/hr) = t2
4.5 hr = t2

Hope that helped,

Tatiana
Tatiana Becker | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:18 pm

by islands80 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:01 pm
As I was doing this problem, I usually am confused whenever to add the 3 or subtract it from time. For instance, wouldn't 6t = 10(t-3) be mathematically equivalent b/c the second cyclist travels 3 hours after the first cyclist?

but the answer obviously yields a different result. Is the rule of thumb to add the time instead of subtracting it?

Sorry if this is a dumb question.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
Thanked: 335 times
Followed by:98 members

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:26 pm
Hi islands,

Not a dumb question at all!! It doesn't matter whether you add 3 hours to one side or subtract 3 from the other. If you do the work properly, the answer will be the same. The important thing is that the object that traveled longer have the longer time. So we could have t for the shorter time and t+3 for the longer time, or we could have t-3 for the shorter time and t for the longer time.

Just know what you're solving for. If you want the shorter time, you would be solving for t in the first case, but you would be solving for t-3 in the 2nd case.

If you have trouble with advanced Rate questions, use the Drill Generator to create and take timed drills, and set topics='Rates & Work' and difficulty='600-700 & 700+'

Hope that helps,
-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.