BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distance Rate Time Problem

Expert replies
by LifetimesofSC » Mon May 26, 2008 6:36 am
Two cyclists start biking from a trail’s start 3 hours apart. The second cyclist travels at 10 miles per hour and starts 3 hours after the first cyclist who is traveling at 6 miles per hour. How much time will pass before the second cyclist catches up with the first from the time the second cyclist started biking?


2 hours
4 ½ hours
5 ¾ hours
6 hours
7 ½ hours

I KNOW the Answer is 4.5 hrs (B). This is obtained by subtracting the miles difference 10-6=4 and taking the 6*3=18 and dividing by 4 = 4.5.

When I approach these types of questions I automatically create a chart. When I create a chart using this question I get the wrong answer. Please advise on a proper set up.

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by VP_Tatiana » Tue May 27, 2008 7:05 pm
Here's an algebraic approach:

We know the good 'ole formula d = rt (distance equals rate times time). This is a good time to use that one.

Here are our variables:

d = distance the cyclists have traveled at the point cyclist 2 passes cyclist 1
r1 = rate of cyclist 1
r2 = rate of cyclist 2
t1 = time that cyclist 1 rides
t2 = time that cyclist 2 rides

Here are the formulas we can infer from the problem statement:
d = r1*t1
d = r2*t2
t1 = t2 + 3 hrs

Let's set the first two equations equal. This gives us:

r1*t1 = r2*t2

Plugging in the numbers from the problem statement as well as the third formula, I get:

6 mi/hr (t2 + 3 hr) = 10 mi/hr * t2

Multiplying I get:

(6 mi/hr * t2) + 18 mi = 10 mi/hr * t2
18 mi = 4 mi/hr * t2
18 mi/(4 mi/hr) = t2
4.5 hr = t2

Hope that helped,

Tatiana
Tatiana Becker | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by islands80 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:01 pm
As I was doing this problem, I usually am confused whenever to add the 3 or subtract it from time. For instance, wouldn't 6t = 10(t-3) be mathematically equivalent b/c the second cyclist travels 3 hours after the first cyclist?

but the answer obviously yields a different result. Is the rule of thumb to add the time instead of subtracting it?

Sorry if this is a dumb question.
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:26 pm
Hi islands,

Not a dumb question at all!! It doesn't matter whether you add 3 hours to one side or subtract 3 from the other. If you do the work properly, the answer will be the same. The important thing is that the object that traveled longer have the longer time. So we could have t for the shorter time and t+3 for the longer time, or we could have t-3 for the shorter time and t for the longer time.

Just know what you're solving for. If you want the shorter time, you would be solving for t in the first case, but you would be solving for t-3 in the 2nd case.

If you have trouble with advanced Rate questions, use the Drill Generator to create and take timed drills, and set topics='Rates & Work' and difficulty='600-700 & 700+'

Hope that helps,
-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion