720 (Q49 V40): Verbal-only Prep On a Shoestring

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:49 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Despite posting in this forum, I can't say that I beat the GMAT...but I ain't doing it again. =)

As a math major and an ex-"Mathlete", I am slightly bothered by the Q49, since I think I can do a 50 or 51. But since my goal was a 720 (and would retake if below 720), I will stick to my words.

First of all, my first lang was not English; though I speak fluently, I always knew my grammar is off.
Secondly, I don't consider myself smart at all. But I am smart enough to realize that fact, and throughout my undergrad I worked hard to make up for the lack of brain ammunition.
Though I originally expected the GMAT to be a IQ-test that cannot be improved, I remember reading somewhere that if one put in more efforts than 90% of people out there, one can achieve above 90 percentile scores.
...so if you've never read that before, I can attest to that statement.

Prep time: ~70 days
Total prep hours: almost 400


CATs
GMAT Prep 1 (no studying): 610
800score quant 1: 50
800score verbal 1: 32
800score verbal 2: 34
GMAT Prep 1 repeat (after 1 month): 720 Q50V38

At this point I realized that SC is a HUGE problem for me, since in the GMAT Prep 1 retake I made 12 verbal mistakes - ALL of which are SC! It was easy for me to pick a focus on my studying. I hit the books hard, and went through anything I could get my hands on. See the list of books below.

800score verbal 3: 33
MGMAT CAT 1: 690 q48 v36
800score verbal 1 again: 34

Gotten frustrated at this point, I bought the MGMAT SC guide off Amazon - the only book I purchased =P

MGMAT CAT 2: 730 q51 v39
MGMAT CAT 3: 690 q49 v35
GMAT Prep 2: 710 q50 v36
Knewton diagnostics: (see below)
GMAT Prep 2 retake 2 days before GMAT day: 780 q50 v47

During the retake of GMAT Prep 2 I saw very little overlaps, and I only made 2 mistakes in verbal. To be honest throughout the entire time I always knew that I can hit a 780, since most of the times my ONLY mistakes happens in SC. This CAT boosted my confidence quite a bit.

I was interested in Knewton since they do a goodjob with their marketing. I tried their free sample questions on the website and thought the questions were realistic. Oh and I signed up to do the $100 thing with Josh.

About the Knewton Diagnostic Test, I scored 5XX. It was bad, but right away I knew it was way off and I didn't let it bother me. While I do believe that their algorithm needs to be adjusted, their questions were realistic. For a few instances, I found the exact OG questions they imitated. So for the ones out there who are worried because of their Knewton Diag score, I hope my experience will give you some comfort.

If given more time, I think I would have taken some more MGMAT CATs, I heard that scores will start to go up after CAT 3 since they run out of harder questions. That would have been a good confidence booster, but between the 6 MGMAT and free ones out there, I had more than enough CATs. By the way, I did the essays each time, even for the retakes.


Materials Used (While on a shoestring)
Upon recently returning from a few months of social work in an orphanage in Africa, I definitely wasn't interested in dropping money on materials I get from the local library. Like I said before, the only book I purchased was the MGMAT SC guide, the rest were from the library and passed down from a friend.

AWA
GMAT-CAT Answers to The Real Essay Questions (Arco/Thompson)
-Flipped through it for 30 mins, got the gist of it. I think it went alright, but will update the AWA score. [update: awa score 5.5]

Math
OG12: did maybe the later third of the problems, stop doing math regularly may have contributed to the drop to Q49

Others
Thursdays with Ron
-attended 3 of them, and listened for all of them in the archive. The first SC ones were great.
Knewton Free Session
-Took the free session with Dave. It was great and I decided that if my real score were below 720, I would have signed up with them
BTG Forum
-Advices, study plans and strategies found on the forum were invaluable.
-One thing of concern for me on the BTG was the source of the questions. I didn't like to spend tons of time on questions that are unrealistic. On the flip side, during the exam, I realized that there were a 3 or 4 DS questions I did on the BTG being EXACTLY the same as the real thing, numbers and everything. They all came from the same poster whom I won't name here. Mods, I'm not sure if those questionable sources break the forum rules.

Verbal
Here comes the long list of verbal material: in the order that I read
MGMAT SC guide super old edition
-passed down, very short compare to the 4th ed
Powerscore CR Bible
-didn't help me much since my CR was already at a fairly high level
MGMAT CR&RC guide super old edition
-I only read it because I had the book, but I did like the diagramming techniques for harder CR questions; I started to diagram most of the CRs, forcing me to do active reading
Schaum's English Grammar
-Reminded me of my ESL days in middle school, re-taught me some grammar with pretty useful end-of-chapter exercises
-On some sections, it wasn't sufficient (it is Schaum's outline after all)
Doing Grammar by Max Morenberg
-got this book from the library since it had wonderful reviews
-it's not bad, it was dry to read through it, but the exercises were helpful, and I think it is more suited for someone who is more logical-minded
-again, it was dry, and I had to force myself to finish the book. I don't think this is for someone with no knowledge in grammar whatsoever, but it is a good book. In hindsight, it was a good idea to go through Schaum's before this book.
Element of Style
-I started to like grammar at this point and enjoyed it
Princeton Review's Grammar Smart
-I think I liked this book the best, mainly because of its humor; I must admit they probably tried hard to make this book enjoyable, and it worked for me
-also found the audio book version at the library, so I listened to it before I fall asleep every now and then, the audio version is more fun
MGMAT SC guide 4th Ed
-the last book to seal the deal. After all these other grammar books, I understood the SC guide quite well, and stepped up my SC accuracy to the 85-90% range
-also came with some extra CATs and the SC question bank, there is great value in this book

Last but not least: OG 12 & OG Verbal 1st Ed
-Went through the verbal sections in detail: CR 2 times, RC once and SC 3-4 times


Words of Advice
I followed the strategies from various success stories, and modified my strategy along the way. The strategies on this forum are fairly complete, so I won't comment further. Two seemingly small things that helped me are below.

Disable Facebook
First thing I noticed is that I checked my facebook too much. So I went into system32 and blocked the port. That works like a charm. Believe or not, taking out this distraction helped my efficiency quite a bit.

Eat well & Exercise
I cannot stress exercising enough. It was a great 're-boot' for the brain, and I actually noticed my hit rates being consistently higher on the evenings of the days I exercised.

Find a Way Away from GMAT
Along the same line as exercising, learn to forget GMAT sometimes. I went through almost the entire series of The Sopranos during my prep, and guess what, when Tony Soprano is using bad grammar, it don't bother me.

That's all, hope this can give some materials and confidence for fellow GMAT takers with verbal trouble.
PS. grand $ total of my GMAT experience: $250(GMAC) + $23(MGMAT SC) - $100(Knewton)=$173, how's that for an ROI!
Last edited by iamtensai on Thu May 27, 2010 5:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

by nikhilkatira » Sat May 22, 2010 10:01 pm
Congratulations!!! 720 is a gr8 score...
As u said u did OG SC 3-4 times....can you pls share what type of detailed review u did ?
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Sat May 22, 2010 10:21 pm
I think there's a misconception on the casual relationship between "native" English speaker and ability to perform on verbal. Most natives like myself are actually at a disadvantage, because we have to unlearn all the horrible grammars we see and hear everyday. For example, I think it's much harder to unlearn a false idiom than to memorize one from scratch...

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:49 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by iamtensai » Sun May 23, 2010 7:06 am
nikhilkatira wrote:Congratulations!!! 720 is a gr8 score...
As u said u did OG SC 3-4 times....can you pls share what type of detailed review u did ?
Thanks. I don't think I was very efficient with my prep though, but considering I started at 30% hit rate for SC questions, I'm quite satisfied.
I went through the SC section of OG12 4 times, and OG Verbal 3 times. I started with the OG12, leaving the Verbal supp as extra practice.

During the first and 2nd go at the OG12, I merely read through the solutions where I made mistakes. I only learned how to solve those SPECIFIC questions, but did not actually learn the general concepts. Thus, I performed poorly on the OG Verbal, when the questions were entirely different.

After going through all the verbal books and MGMAT SC guide 4th ed, I went through the OG12 as part of the end of chapter exercises. At that point I was understanding the solutions very well, and had a decent hit rate of 70%.

During the last time through, I learned that reviewing each correct and wrong answers is of crucial importance. (despite that's a key point many people brought up, I finally learned)
I understood MULTIPLE reasons why each answer choices was right or wrong, and reviewed each answer choices, rather than reviewing the questions as a whole.

The ones I missed, or unsure of, I kept them in a spreadsheet. Each time I make an error in the general concept, I look up the questions in the forum, and copy/pasted the concepts in a document.
Then repeat on the wrong ones again.

I think Stacey did a good write-up on "How to Analyst a SC Problem", I used the article to modify my approach.
uwhusky wrote:I think there's a misconception on the casual relationship between "native" English speaker and ability to perform on verbal. Most natives like myself are actually at a disadvantage, because we have to unlearn all the horrible grammars we see and hear everyday. For example, I think it's much harder to unlearn a false idiom than to memorize one from scratch...
I agree that being a native English speaker could be a double-edged sword. But I cannot agree that a native English speaker is at a disadvantage by any means.

In a few instances where I've picked the wrong answer on a SC problem and looked up the explanations on the MGMAT Forum, only to read Ron's explanation along the line of "if you are a native speaker, this sentence will sound awkward, though it is grammatically correct".

Also, I agree that some of the idioms are misused in everyday speech, but I don't think there are that many (and frankly, most grammar books cover the common mistakes very well). I can only draw from my own experience: my better half is a native speaker (and a math major like myself). When I read her sample sentences from the SC guide such as "She has mistaken me as a wealthier person", she can right away tell me that I sound silly. I did that with many idioms I had problems with, and in most cases, not only she could tell me that my sentence is wrong, she could also give me the correct version.

Lastly, I'd like to say that one of the biggest disadvantage of a non-native speaker is the lack of comprehension. There are a few test takers who are having trouble with RC, CR, SC and even the quant section because they don't understand meaning of the arguments or questions.

While I recognize that idioms are hard for everyone, I don't believe unlearning 10 or 15 idioms is harder than learning the basic comprehension of the text, with idioms on top of that. Don't mean to bash but to say that native speaker are at a DISADVANTAGE in the verbal section, at least to me, is absurd.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Sun May 23, 2010 5:40 pm
I think I have missed a few key words here and there that may have distorted my intent, but I do agree with your evaluation of the native English speaker.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Pune

by dixitsandeep » Tue May 25, 2010 10:49 pm
Yes. Reading comp is biggest challange for non native speakers and not the SC.
CR should be same for everybody.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:53 am

by aninik » Thu May 27, 2010 10:12 pm
iamtensai wrote:
About the Knewton Diagnostic Test, I scored 5XX. It was bad, but right away I knew it was way off and I didn't let it bother me. While I do believe that their algorithm needs to be adjusted, their questions were realistic. For a few instances, I found the exact OG questions they imitated. So for the ones out there who are worried because of their Knewton Diag score, I hope my experience will give you some comfort.


How do you gauge which questions are realistic or unrealistic. I would always like to presume the extremely tough ones are unrealistic but that cant be it.