"The purpose of government is not to ensure the financial well-being of its citizens, but rather to maintain order."
From your perspective, how accurate is the above statement? Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
YOUR RESPONSE:
The author states that the purpose of the government is not to ensure the financial well-being of its citizens, but rather to maintain order. Although the author makes a realistic attempt to describe the role of the government, I believe that ensuring the well being of its citizens is no doubt the most crucial role to be played. This could ensure growth of the country in several aspects.
First, a nation can prosper only when there is equal growth across all societies. The role of the government is to provide infrastructure, facilities and security to all its people. When the citizens are financially sound, there is greater oppurtunity for the government to develop other areas of growth.. They should hence set up a program that provides financial assistance to those who are below the average financial index.
Second, If the governments role is to maintain order, then thy must ensure that there is lesser poverty and unemployment as there would be lesser crime among financially secure people. For example, the crime rate in Finland is negligible as the government plays a major role in the financial well being of all its citizens.
Although some may argue that introducing such programs may not necessarily reduce crime rate, it is without doubt that countries with such poilicies experience greater peace.This in turne lesser resources in terms of human resource and financial resource are assigned to maintaining order and further the government can concentrate in greater developments like infrastructure, public facilities, transport that advances a nations progress as a whole.
In conclusion, the financial well being of the citizens of a nation can in turn ensure order and peace without the government spending quality resources on maintaining the same exclusively.
From your perspective, how accurate is the above statement? Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
YOUR RESPONSE:
The author states that the purpose of the government is not to ensure the financial well-being of its citizens, but rather to maintain order. Although the author makes a realistic attempt to describe the role of the government, I believe that ensuring the well being of its citizens is no doubt the most crucial role to be played. This could ensure growth of the country in several aspects.
First, a nation can prosper only when there is equal growth across all societies. The role of the government is to provide infrastructure, facilities and security to all its people. When the citizens are financially sound, there is greater oppurtunity for the government to develop other areas of growth.. They should hence set up a program that provides financial assistance to those who are below the average financial index.
Second, If the governments role is to maintain order, then thy must ensure that there is lesser poverty and unemployment as there would be lesser crime among financially secure people. For example, the crime rate in Finland is negligible as the government plays a major role in the financial well being of all its citizens.
Although some may argue that introducing such programs may not necessarily reduce crime rate, it is without doubt that countries with such poilicies experience greater peace.This in turne lesser resources in terms of human resource and financial resource are assigned to maintaining order and further the government can concentrate in greater developments like infrastructure, public facilities, transport that advances a nations progress as a whole.
In conclusion, the financial well being of the citizens of a nation can in turn ensure order and peace without the government spending quality resources on maintaining the same exclusively.
