BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Must be True

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:530

by vishalwin » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:23 am
Hi All,

So you mean we need not to consider case when "case a: x > -1 " because it is given that x < -5

Am I right?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 7:45 am

by Dhara Pujara » Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:17 pm
Hi Brent,

Had a query relative to your answer..

when we try to solve the equation: 4 < (7-x)/3; wouldn't multiplying both the sides by 3 reverse the inequality sign?

This would typically look like: 12 > (7-x).

Please help...

Cheers,
Dhara
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:03 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 8 times

by chetan.sharma » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:29 pm
Dhara Pujara wrote:Hi Brent,

Had a query relative to your answer..

when we try to solve the equation: 4 < (7-x)/3; wouldn't multiplying both the sides by 3 reverse the inequality sign?

This would typically look like: 12 > (7-x).

Please help...

Cheers,
Dhara
Hi,
the sign gets reversed only when you multiply both sides by a negative integer/-ive fraction etc, and not by a positive number..
Hope it helped
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply