A violin constructed to have improved sound...(inference)

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times
A violin constructed to have improved sound would sound different from the best-sounding existing violins.
To professional violinists, a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins.
Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins.
Would be the best supported by those statements?
(A) Only amateur violinists should be asked to judge the sound quality of newly constructed violins.
(B) Professional violinists supervise the construction of violins.
(C) The best-sounding existing violins have been in existence fro several centuries.
(D) It is currently impossible to construct a violin that the only accepted judges will evaluate as having improved sound.
(E) It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists.


OA- D
Last edited by S0laris on Sat Mar 14, 2009 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
we are the champions !
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:23 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:590

by nitya34 » Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:32 am
is it D?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members

by karmayogi » Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:14 pm
I selected D by method of elimination. We can easily eliminate A, B, and C. Option E is a case of extreme conclusion; hence, eliminated the option. Left with D.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:52 pm
karmayogi wrote:I selected D by method of elimination. We can easily eliminate A, B, and C. Option E is a case of extreme conclusion; hence, eliminated the option. Left with D.
Dude

But don't you think word "impossible" in D falls into extreme category as well.

Although , I managed to pick the right choice but for a while I lingered between option D and E

Please share your thoughts!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members

by karmayogi » Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:19 pm
piyush_nitt wrote:
karmayogi wrote:I selected D by method of elimination. We can easily eliminate A, B, and C. Option E is a case of extreme conclusion; hence, eliminated the option. Left with D.
Dude

But don't you think word "impossible" in D falls into extreme category as well.

Although , I managed to pick the right choice but for a while I lingered between option D and E

Please share your thoughts!
Piyush my mistake; I didn't explain my logic properly. Ok here is my logic:

Why is E, "It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists" is an extreme conclusion? The argument put across it's point only about Professional violinists, but we can't generalize this and say that rest everyone has a view contrary to that of Professional violinists.

Although "impossible" word in D has an extreme connotation, it fits in the argument. There exists best sounding violins, and professional violinists believe that "a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins." Also, "Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins." It's a deadlock situation. Hence, it's impossible to make a violin that is better than the best and that will be approved by accepted judges, prof violinists.

I hope, I have made my point clear.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:04 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:620

by bmlaud » Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:06 am
This is a must be true question, any new information should immediately be ruled out.

(A) Only amateur violinists should be asked to judge the sound quality of newly constructed violins. No mention of amateurs in the passage.

(B) Professional violinists supervise the construction of violins. Not mentioned clearly
(C) The best-sounding existing violins have been in existence for several centuries. may be -50-50 chances

(D) It is currently impossible to construct a violin that the only accepted judges will evaluate as having improved sound. Yes, passage says that

(E) It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists. No mention of preference of other people.
Thus D
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:00 am
karmayogi wrote:
piyush_nitt wrote:
karmayogi wrote:I selected D by method of elimination. We can easily eliminate A, B, and C. Option E is a case of extreme conclusion; hence, eliminated the option. Left with D.
Dude

But don't you think word "impossible" in D falls into extreme category as well.

Although , I managed to pick the right choice but for a while I lingered between option D and E

Please share your thoughts!
Piyush my mistake; I didn't explain my logic properly. Ok here is my logic:

Why is E, "It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists" is an extreme conclusion? The argument put across it's point only about Professional violinists, but we can't generalize this and say that rest everyone has a view contrary to that of Professional violinists.

Although "impossible" word in D has an extreme connotation, it fits in the argument. There exists best sounding violins, and professional violinists believe that "a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins." Also, "Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins." It's a deadlock situation. Hence, it's impossible to make a violin that is better than the best and that will be approved by accepted judges, prof violinists.

I hope, I have made my point clear.
Thanks buddy for your time and effort.

I really appreciate it!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 11:23 am
Thanks for the replies. I too marked D

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:46 pm

by hle8 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:37 am
You did a very clear explanation. Thank you so much!
Dude

But don't you think word "impossible" in D falls into extreme category as well.

Although , I managed to pick the right choice but for a while I lingered between option D and E

Please share your thoughts![/quote]
Piyush my mistake; I didn't explain my logic properly. Ok here is my logic:

Why is E, "It is possible to construct a violin that sounds better than the best-sounding existing violins to everyone but professional violinists" is an extreme conclusion? The argument put across it's point only about Professional violinists, but we can't generalize this and say that rest everyone has a view contrary to that of Professional violinists.

Although "impossible" word in D has an extreme connotation, it fits in the argument. There exists best sounding violins, and professional violinists believe that "a violin that sounds different from the best-sounding existing violins sounds less like a violin and therefore worse than the best-sounding existing violins." Also, "Professional violinists are the only accepted judges of the sound quality of violins." It's a deadlock situation. Hence, it's impossible to make a violin that is better than the best and that will be approved by accepted judges, prof violinists.

I hope, I have made my point clear.[/quote]