BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by selango » Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:14 am
Slope=-(Y intercept)/(X intercept)

=-3/2
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:41 am
Hi there,

Let me give you a small summary on lines/slopes (just for lines in the plane xOy, for sure), because a folk asked me about this in private message...

Every line may be put on the form ax+by = c where a, b, c are real constants, the first two not simmultaneously zero.
This is the general form of a line (in a plane), and we have some important details on that:

> The line passes through the origin, that is, point (0,0) if and only if c is null.

> If a = 0 (then b is not), then y = c/b = constant, that means that the line is horizontal.
Important particular case: when c is zero, we have the "x axis", that may be written as (x,y) in the plane such that y = 0.

> If b = 0 (then a is not), then x = c/a = constant, that means that the line is vertical.
Important part. case: when c is zero, we have the "y axis", that may be written as (x,y) in the plane such that x = 0.

> If b is NOT null, that means the line may be put on the form (called reduced) y = mx +n, where m is the SLOPE of the line and n is the y-intersect ;

I repeat: slopes are defined if and only if the lines are non-vertical.

Slopes are the ratio of the variation on y over the variation on x ("raise over run", as some people say)...

When the slope is (say) 4, that means that going to the RIGHT (say) 1 unit of length, the line goes UP 4 units of length...
When the slope is (say) -0.3, that means that going to the RIGHT (say) 1 unit of length, the line goes DOWN 0.3 units of length...

As far as slopes are concerned, two important properties you should know:

1)

when the slope is positive, the line is "going upwards" (from left to right) ;
when the slope is null (zero), the line is horizontal
when the slope is negative, the line is "going downwards" (from left to right);

P.S.: put your LEFT hand up and down, to "see" slopes positives and negatives.... ;)

2)

when the MODULUS of the slope is between 0 and 1, the line is horizontalized, I mean, it´s more "near" horizontal than "near" vertical, considering that slopes 1 and -1 are the "equal" horizontal and vertical (lines with slopes 1 and -1 are parallel to the lines y = x and y = -x...)

when the MODULUS of the slope is greater than 1, the line is verticalized, I mean, it´s more "near" vertical than "near" horizontal, considering that slopes 1 and -1 are... (the same above)

I hope this helps!

As far as the problem itself is concerned, I will solve it below if someone hasn´t already done this while I was typing....

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:53 am
As promised:

Obs.: the examiner asks for the slope, that means that we may admit (as hypothesis) that the line k is certainly NOT VERTICAL!

Answer: C

(1) BIFURCATES:

> If the line is (say) y = x-2, then (when y=0 we know that x = 2, so its x-intercept is really 2 and) the slope is 1
> If the line is (say) y = 2x-4, then (when y=0 we know that x = 2, so its x-intercept is really 2 and) the slope is 2

Obs.: you may consider the line given is different from the x-axis... otherwise the x-intercept would not be "only" 2... think about it...

(2) BIFURCATES:

> If the line is (say) y = x+3, then (when x=0 we know that y = 3, so its y-intercept is really 3 and) the slope is 1
> If the line is (say) y = 2x+3, then (when x=0 we know that y = 3, so its y-intercept is really 3 and) the slope is 2

(1+2) DECIDES!

Please note that points (0,3) and (2,0) are two points of the line k, therefore when x varies (runs) from 0 to 2 (+2) then y varies (raises) from 3 to 0 (IN THAT ORDER, so -3), hence the slope is really -3/2, as selango mentioned.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion