BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The removal of hillsides

Expert replies
by YellowSapphire » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:10 pm
Source: Knewton

The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

A: Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.
B: The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.
C: New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.
D: Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.
E: Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.

OA: D
Last edited by YellowSapphire on Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kanagasu » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:23 am
I go with 'E'
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:34 am
IMO A
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by paes » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:56 am
IMO A

confuse between A and E.
But A is looking better.
Join the discussion

by getso » Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:30 pm
Same here..Confused between A and E.

What is the OA??
Join the discussion

by YellowSapphire » Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:36 pm
Hello Mate,

I just now posted OA above. OA is quite confusing. I am OK with OA but I did wrongly on first instance.

How can we eliminate others 4 choices.
Yellow Sapphire
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:53 pm
I am confused between D and E ..

IMO : E
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by amritashwar_lal2k » Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:25 pm
The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

Statements are :

Mining by removing hillsides and mountain tops -> Comparatively quick but destroys forest

Deep bore method -> Time consuming and saves forest

Public opinion -> No coal mining -> states allow mining for shorter period

Therefore, short period is only possible by removing hillsides and mountain tops -> public opinion is destroying forest

Hence, D logically follows
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:10 am
YellowSapphire wrote:Source: Knewton

The removal of hillsides and mountaintops, necessary for mining companies to extract coal quickly from deeply-buried seams, destroys forests. Experts therefore recommend that coal be extracted using time-consuming deep bore techniques.

Because public opinion opposes coal mining, some states now allow mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time.

The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

A: Mining companies will continue to be able to extract coal using deep bore techniques but not by removing hillsides or mountaintops.
B: The only way to preserve forests on hillsides and mountaintops is to stop coal mining.
C: New mining techniques will be developed to make it possible to extract coal quickly without removing hillsides or mountaintops.
D: Public opinion regarding coal mining works against forest preservation efforts.
E: Allowing mining companies to extract coal from any particular site for only a short period of time is unlikely to be a successful response to public opinion.

OA: D
i just dont understand what D means....hmhmhm
i do undersstand that the public oppose extracting coal and wants to protect the forest however in D, it says that public opinion oppose the forest preservation
i dont understand... i am confused
i chose E
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:45 am
Very nice question. Props to Knewton.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:18 am
How can we explain the stand of point E?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by chris@magoosh » Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:41 pm
First let me start off by simplifying things:

1. To get coal quickly companies have to remove hills.

2. Removing hills destroys forests.

3. An alternative: (time-consuming) bore techniques will not require hills to be removed.

4. Public opinion doesn't like coal mining so will only allow companies to drill for short time.

That means companies can not use time-consuming bore techniques and will have to mine quickly. To get coal quickly they have to remove hills. Hmm, so it seems that public opinion is actually forcing companies to use a technique that is harmful to the forests.

(D), the Answer, captures this nicely.


(E) doesn't work for the following reason. Remember, public opinion has led to a compromise in some states, i.e. only a short time to mine. As a response it is def. successful, because companies can mine quickly. Mining companies win. Public opinion is assuaged. And the forests lose.

Hope that makes sense :).
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:25 pm
IMO is the argument read " public opinion opposes time consuming coal mining" then D makes more sense.. otherwise imo E is much better....
Join the discussion