BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Tough CR from GPREP

Expert replies
by riteshbindal » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:38 pm
In a certain wildlife park, park rangers are able to track the movements of many rhinoceroses because those animals wear radio collars. When, as often happens, a collar slips off, it is put back on. Putting a collar on a rhinoceros involves immobilizing the animal by shooting it with a tranquilizer dart. Female rhinoceroses that have been frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females. Probably, therefore, some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.

In evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?

A. Whether there are more collared female rhinoceroses than uncollared female rhinoceroses in the park.
B. How the tranquilizer that is used for immobilizing rhinoceroses differs, if at all, from tranquilizers used in working with other large mammals
C. How often park rangers need to use tranquilizer darts to immobilize rhinoceroses for reasons other than attaching radio collars
D. Whether male rhinoceroses in the wildlife park lose their collars any more often than the park's female rhinoceroses do
E. Whether radio collars are the only practical means that park rangers have for tracking the movements of rhinoceroses in the park

OA after some discussion. Please put explanation for rejecting/accepting any choice.
Last edited by riteshbindal on Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by singhag » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:56 pm
This is a tough one.

By the POE the contender are [spoiler]C and E...

I am more inclined toward C as E is the basis of the argument and does not specify that use of Tranquilizer will have any effect or not[/spoiler]

IMO C
Join the discussion

by singhag » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:57 pm
This is a tough one.

By the POE the contender are [spoiler]C and E...

I am more inclined toward C as E is the basis of the argument and does not specify that use of Tranquilizer will have any effect or not[/spoiler]

IMO C
Join the discussion

by srivas » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:02 pm
Female rhinoceroses that have been frequently recollared have significantly lower fertility rates than uncollared females

some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility

here we need to understand what is happening to malw rahinos

IMO D
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:08 pm
Please put explanation for rejecting/accepting any choice.
Join the discussion

IMO B

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:50 am
imo b
THE CONCLUSION IS
some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.

IN OREDR TO EVALUATE THIS WE NEED TO KNOW THE OPTION WHICH IMPACTS THE OPTION,
IN B WE ANS IT AS TRUE THAT MEANS IT DOES EFFECT THE OTHER LARGE MAMMALS FERTILITY THEN CONCLUSION IS VALIED
OR IF IT IS FALSE THAT IS OTHER MAMMALS WHEN GIVEN SDAME TRANQUILIZERS DOESN'T SHOW ANY EFFECTS THEN THE CONCLUSION IS WRONG.

HENCE OPTION B SERVES THE PURPOSE.
OA pls
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by arjunn7 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:56 am
I wud go for D.
Its very clear that, to check female's fertility, we need really need to know first that the problem is in them, not in their mating partner..
Work Hard till You succeed.. N even after that..!!
Join the discussion

Re: IMO B

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:02 am
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:imo b
THE CONCLUSION IS
some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility.

IN OREDR TO EVALUATE THIS WE NEED TO KNOW THE OPTION WHICH IMPACTS THE OPTION,
IN B WE ANS IT AS TRUE THAT MEANS IT DOES EFFECT THE OTHER LARGE MAMMALS FERTILITY THEN CONCLUSION IS VALIED
OR IF IT IS FALSE THAT IS OTHER MAMMALS WHEN GIVEN SDAME TRANQUILIZERS DOESN'T SHOW ANY EFFECTS THEN THE CONCLUSION IS WRONG.


IMO B
HENCE OPTION B SERVES THE PURPOSE.
OA pls
Join the discussion

by hitmewithgmat » Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:01 pm
OA is C.
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:33 pm
OA: C[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by sudi760mba » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:08 am
Why C?
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:41 am
sudi760mba wrote:Why C?
the best way to "justify" the oa here is to eliminate the other answers. this is more straightforward than on many other problems, because ALL of the wrong answers are VERY much outside the argument's scope.

(a) irrelevant, as the numbers of collared vs. uncollared rhinos are irrelevant to fertility rates (presumably measured in babies per rhino, or # of copulations required per pregnancy, or some other figure that doesn't have anything to do with the total population size).

(b) irrelevant; the argument deals only with rhinos.

(d) irrelevant; the argument deals only with FEMALE rhinos.

(e) irrelevant; the purpose of the collar doesn't affect the fertility issue. moreover, other means of tracking the rhinos lie outside the scope of the argument.

--

that leaves (c).

the reason (c) matters is because the study purports to cover the differences between rhinos that have been hit with tranquilizer darts (let's call them "tranks") and those that haven't. however, the study DOESN'T directly split the rhinos into "trank" and "non-trank" groups; it splits them into "frequently recollared" and "not frequently recollared" groups.
the argument therefore depends on the assumption that "frequently recollared" is an adequate proxy for "been hit by tranks" and that "not frequently recollared" is an adequate proxy for "not been hit by tranks".
choice (c) is very much relevant to this assumption, because that association falls apart if the rhinos are getting tranked for lots of other reasons in addition to the collar issue.

but again, the wrong answers are easy pickings here, so you probably don't even need to think this much.

--

the real question is whether the rhinos can pop their collars.
;)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by NikolayZ » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:12 am
Also thought about D as a right answer. But came up with an idea that the statement is concerned only with female's fertility rate. From the biology point of view it would make sense =))))) (if Tranc. infected males are not willing to date untranquilized females, hehe )

All other are really out of scope. Except C =)
Join the discussion