BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Modulus PS

Expert replies

by mathewmithun » Thu May 17, 2012 12:25 am
Shalabh's Quants wrote:Dear Mithun,

See this one from Master GMAT.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2012/04/ ... perts-miss
thank you once again Shalabh. I think I can face must be true questions henceforth...

I would like to thank Aneesh, Mitch and others too...
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Thu Jun 30, 2016 11:40 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
mathewmithun wrote:If x/lxl<x, which of the following must be true about x
(Note: Read lxl as modulus x)

A) x>1
B) x>-1
C) lxl<1
D) lxl = 1
E) lxl^2 > 1
An efficient approach is to COMPARE THE ANSWER CHOICES and to plug in values that are included in some ranges but not in others.

A: x > 1
B: x > -1

x=-1/2 is included in the range of answer choice B but not in the range of answer choice A.
Plugging x = -1/2 into x/lxl<x, we get:
(-1/2)/|1/2| < -1/2
-1 < -1/2.
This works.
Eliminate A and any other answer choice that does not include x=-1/2 within its range.
Eliminate A, D and E.

B: x > -1
C: |x| < 1.

x=2 is included in the range of answer choice B but not in the range of answer choice C.
Plugging x=2 into x/lxl<x, we get:
(2)/|2| < 2
1 < 2.
This works.
Eliminate C.

The correct answer is B.
Dear Mitch,

I understood the solution but I have a doubt about Choice B.

Choice B is: X>-1, does it mean that 0 included in the choice B, while X can't be 0 as it will make denumerator be 0.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:23 am
Mo2men wrote:Dear Mitch,

I understood the solution but I have a doubt about Choice B.

Choice B is: X>-1, does it mean that 0 included in the choice B, while X can't be 0 as it will make denominator be 0.

Thanks
I offer an alternate approach here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/let-get-abso ... 27383.html

The alternate approach indicates two ranges that satisfy x/|x| < x:
-1<x<0 and x>1.
Question stem:
Which of the following must be true about x?
B: x>-1
Since both of the ranges in red are to the right of -1 on the number line, it must be true that x>-1.
Thus, answer choice B must be true about x.

The OA does not imply that EVERY value greater than -1 is a valid solution for x/|x|<x.
It implies the reverse:
That every valid solution for x/|x|<x is greater than -1.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by mjmehta81 » Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:41 pm
Hello Mitch,
I do not understand where I am wrong in my understanding below.

For option A.. let x=3, so 3/mod(3)=1. 1 less than 3. This is true for all value of x greater than 1. So why A is wrong option.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:56 pm
Hi mjmehta81,

When a question asks "which of the following must be true...", it's ultimately asking "which of the following is ALWAYS TRUE no matter how many different examples you come up with..."

With X = 3, three of the answer choices "appear" to be true (Answers A, B and E), but they can't all always be true, so you have to do a bit more work to eliminate two of the answer choices. If you try X = -1/2, you'll end up with....

(-1/2)/|-1/2| < -1/2
(-1/2)/(1/2) < -1/2
-1 < -1/2

Thus, X COULD be -1/2. With this solution, you can eliminate answers A and E, leaving just one option.

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jul 03, 2016 4:25 am
mjmehta81 wrote:Hello Mitch,
I do not understand where I am wrong in my understanding below.

For option A.. let x=3, so 3/mod(3)=1. 1 less than 3. This is true for all value of x greater than 1. So why A is wrong option.
Question stem:
What must be true about EVERY valid solution for x/|x|<x?
You have correctly determined that x=3 is a valid solution for x|x|<x.
But x=-1/2 is also a valid solution for x|x|<x.
Since it does NOT have to true that EVERY valid for solution x|x|<x is greater than 1, eliminate A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Jul 07, 2016 4:02 pm
In a nutshell, "x must be > -1" ≠ "any number > -1 is a possible value of x". (In GMAT terms, this is the difference between a NECESSARY condition and a SUFFICIENT condition.)
Join the discussion