IMO the use of infinitive is not correct after comma. I am still with 'A'.yogami wrote:whats your take on D vaishali? to analyze sounds so much better than just analyzing. We need an OA and end this controversy !!
modifier problem
-
vaishalijain7
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
- Location: toronto
- Thanked: 5 times
- rahulg83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:710
OA is A as i have posted earlier.yogami wrote:whats your take on D vaishali? to analyze sounds so much better than just analyzing. We need an OA and end this controversy !!
Unfortunately i don't have the OE
-
thetrystero
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
DTo determine whether there are deposits of frozen water on the moon, research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites that orbited the moon's atmosphere, analyzing radar echos from the lunar surface.
A) analyzing
B) as the analysis technique of
C) to the analysis of
D) to analyze
E) a tecnique for analyzing
B&E: "launching" was not a technique to discover water.
C: "to the ... of" construction sounds really awkward
A: who's doing the analyzing?
-
thetrystero
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
the answer to this problem is definitely (a), for the reasons mentioned upthread.yogami wrote:whats your take on D vaishali? to analyze sounds so much better than just analyzing. We need an OA and end this controversy !!
this is a standard present participial (i.e., -ing) modifier, modifying the clause whose verb is "orbited".
you do know that "sounds better" is irrelevant, right?
in fact, for modifier errors, "sounds better" is worse than just irrelevant - it's downright misleading.
modifiers are not spoken in the same ways in which they're written, and vice versa.
they just aren't.
therefore, using sound to decide these things is a sure route to disaster.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
As per my understanding...."ing" verb modifer with comma modifies the subject of the preceding clause....which in my opinion is scientists here.rahulg83 wrote:OA is A
But in A, isn't analyzing modifies atmosphere??
Even i chose D, but OE given was that it would have been a better option had it used 'used to analyze' insted of 'to analyze'.![]()
Any opinions??
Please tell if there are gaps in my understanding.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
i hear ya, but there's also a smaller clause embedded within that clause: "satellites that orbited the earth's atmosphere".goelmohit2002 wrote:As per my understanding...."ing" verb modifer with comma modifies the subject of the preceding clause....which in my opinion is scientists here.rahulg83 wrote:OA is A
But in A, isn't analyzing modifies atmosphere??
Even i chose D, but OE given was that it would have been a better option had it used 'used to analyze' insted of 'to analyze'. :?
Any opinions??
Please tell if there are gaps in my understanding.
it is this clause that's modified by the -ing modifier at the end of the sentence.
yes, there is a certain amount of ambiguity here. but the other choices are actually wrong, and ambiguous beats incorrect hands down.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
I find D is a better choice just by going this part of the sentence:
research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites that orbited the moon's atmosphere, [u]analyzing[/u] radar echos from the lunar surface.
to analyze radar echos from the lunar surface makes sense.
research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites that orbited the moon's atmosphere, [u]analyzing[/u] radar echos from the lunar surface.
to analyze radar echos from the lunar surface makes sense.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
it's not a better choice.pops wrote:I find D is a better choice just by going this part of the sentence:
research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites that orbited the moon's atmosphere, analyzing radar echos from the lunar surface.
to analyze radar echos from the lunar surface makes sense.
if you use an infinitive to express purpose or intentionality, it CANNOT be preceded by a comma.
it just can't.
if it is, then it's incorrect.
(as a completely unintentional example, note the lack of comma in "use an infinitive to express purpose" above.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
- hemanth28
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:05 am
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:680
This is the rule :-
Placing modifiers - In general a modifier must be placed close to its headword - that is the phrase or word it modifies.But different kinds pf modifiers are placed at different positions.
"Participle phrases can appear in various positions."
I guess this question is a great learning.
So in this case the participle modifier is modifying the satellites and not atmosphere. Look at simple example below and it will bust your myths.
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
A) a method to protect
B) as a method protecting
C) protecting
D) as a protection of
E) to protect
Guess what the OA is ?
C
Placing modifiers - In general a modifier must be placed close to its headword - that is the phrase or word it modifies.But different kinds pf modifiers are placed at different positions.
"Participle phrases can appear in various positions."
I guess this question is a great learning.
vaishalijain7
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:31 pm Post subject:
rahulg83 wrote:
OA is A
But in A, isn't analyzing modifies atmosphere??
Even i chose D, but OE given was that it would have been a better option had it used 'used to analyze' insted of 'to analyze'. Confused
Any opinions??
'Analyzing' can't modify 'atmosphere' because you need 'which' after comma if you want to modify atmosphere. Also IMO 'A' is correct because 'analyzing' is present participle and if it's used after comma it modifies the whole preceding clause.
So in this case the participle modifier is modifying the satellites and not atmosphere. Look at simple example below and it will bust your myths.
For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
A) a method to protect
B) as a method protecting
C) protecting
D) as a protection of
E) to protect
Guess what the OA is ?
C
doubt- why the analyzing form not modifying the preceding main clause-"research scientists at NASA launched two unmanned satellites" ??lunarpower wrote:i hear ya, but there's also a smaller clause embedded within that clause: "satellites that orbited the earth's atmosphere".goelmohit2002 wrote:As per my understanding...."ing" verb modifer with comma modifies the subject of the preceding clause....which in my opinion is scientists here.rahulg83 wrote:OA is A
But in A, isn't analyzing modifies atmosphere??
Even i chose D, but OE given was that it would have been a better option had it used 'used to analyze' insted of 'to analyze'.![]()
Any opinions??
Please tell if there are gaps in my understanding.
it is this clause that's modified by the -ing modifier at the end of the sentence.
yes, there is a certain amount of ambiguity here. but the other choices are actually wrong, and ambiguous beats incorrect hands down.
instead its modifying the essential modifier that-clause
how to figure this purpose of -ing modifier??
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hmm-this discussion was dead for more than 5 years before that post. Interesting.
--
Basically, common-sense understanding should resolve these issues. Just ask yourself whether the __ing modifier actually makes sense as a DESCRIPTION of each of these things.
Possibility #1:
They launched satellites ..., analyzing ...
Well, that doesn't really make sense. The launch of the satellites does not involve analysis.
Analysis can't really happen until the satellites get up there and start doing their thing.
Possibility #2:
The satellites orbited ..., analyzing ...
This is 100% sensible.
As the satellites went around and around, they analyzed stuff.
--
Basically, common-sense understanding should resolve these issues. Just ask yourself whether the __ing modifier actually makes sense as a DESCRIPTION of each of these things.
Possibility #1:
They launched satellites ..., analyzing ...
Well, that doesn't really make sense. The launch of the satellites does not involve analysis.
Analysis can't really happen until the satellites get up there and start doing their thing.
Possibility #2:
The satellites orbited ..., analyzing ...
This is 100% sensible.
As the satellites went around and around, they analyzed stuff.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron

















