BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Inequality doubt

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

Inequality doubt

by sachin_yadav » Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:53 am
Hi,

Can anyone please help me in solving the following inequalities:-

(1). x/(x + 2) <= 1/x
My approach :- x/(x + 2) - 1/x <= 0

After calculating, (x - 2)(x + 1) / x(x + 2) <= 0

What is after this ? how can i get the inequality ? What is the right approach ?

(2). x/(x - 3) <= 1/x

Please help in the above questions.

Thanks
Sachin
Never surrender
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:03 am
Please go through the post I made here >> https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-ea ... tml#602154
sachin_yadav wrote:x/(x + 2) <= 1/x
My approach :- x/(x + 2) - 1/x <= 0

After calculating, (x - 2)(x + 1) / x(x + 2) <= 0
(x - 2)(x + 1)/[x(x + 2)] ≤ 0

Critical points of this inequality are : -2, -1, 0, and 2.
Image

As we are looking for less than or equal to zero region, our solution set is -2 < x ≤ -1 and 0 < x ≤ 2
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:22 am
sachin_yadav wrote:(2). x/(x - 3) ≤ 1/x
--> x/(x - 3) - 1/x ≤ 0
--> [x² - x + 3]/[x(x - 3)] ≤ 0

Now, x² - x + 3 is always positive as
  • for |x| > 1, x² > x --> (x² - x) > 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    for |x| < 1, -1 < (x² - x) < 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    For x = 0, (x² - x + 3) = 3 > 0
So our effective inequality is 1/[x(x - 3)] ≤ 0 ---> x(x - 3) < 0 (I replaced ≤ with ≤ because 1/[x(x - 3)] can never be equal to zero)
--> Either {x < 0 and (x - 3) > 0} or {x > 0 and (x - 3) < 0}
--> Either {x < 0 and x > 3} or {x > 0 and x < 3}

The first one is not possible for any x.
Hence, our final solution is 0 < x < 3
Last edited by Anju@Gurome on Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 08, 2013 11:44 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Hi,

Can anyone please help me in solving the following inequalities:-

(1). x/(x + 2) <= 1/x
My approach :- x/(x + 2) - 1/x <= 0

After calculating, (x - 2)(x + 1) / x(x + 2) <= 0

What is after this ?
Check my post here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-229-ho ... 11325.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:57 am
Location: New York & Rotterdam
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:780

by misterholmes » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:41 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Hi,

Can anyone please help me in solving the following inequalities:-

(1). x/(x + 2) <= 1/x
My approach :- x/(x + 2) - 1/x <= 0

After calculating, (x - 2)(x + 1) / x(x + 2) <= 0

What is after this ? how can i get the inequality ? What is the right approach ?

(2). x/(x - 3) <= 1/x

Please help in the above questions.

Thanks
Sachin
Hey Sachin, without anything to go on for x, you have to look out for two kinds of trouble, when dividing by 0 and when multiplying (or dividing) by a negative number. When you put your equation (I) terms over a common denominator, the inequality could change directions on you, depending on the x values you're considering.

Kind Regards,

Misterholmes
www.gmatdojo.com
Mindfulness, Concentration, Insight
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:07 am
Location: Bahrain
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:720

by jainpiyushjain » Wed May 22, 2013 10:03 am
Anju@Gurome wrote: Now, x² - x + 3 is always positive as
  • for |x| > 1, x² > x --> (x² - x) > 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    for |x| < 1, -1 < (x² - x) < 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    For x = 0, (x² - x + 3) = 3 > 0
So our effective inequality is 1/[x(x - 3)] ≤ 0 ---> x(x - 3) < 0 (I replaced ≤ with ≤ because 1/[x(x - 3)] can never be equal to zero)
--> Either {x < 0 and (x - 3) > 0} or {x > 0 and (x - 3) < 0}
--> Either {x < 0 and x > 3} or {x > 0 and x < 3}

The first one is not possible for any x.
Hence, our final solution is 0 < x < 3
Dear Anju

Can you please explain this question again. I was not able to understand how did you prove x² - x + 3 is always positive and why did you consider |x| > 1 and |x| < 1.

Thank you
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:47 am
Thanked: 2 times

by fifafreak » Thu May 23, 2013 12:19 am
jainpiyushjain wrote:
Anju@Gurome wrote: Now, x² - x + 3 is always positive as
  • for |x| > 1, x² > x --> (x² - x) > 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    for |x| < 1, -1 < (x² - x) < 0 ---> (x² - x + 3) > 0
    For x = 0, (x² - x + 3) = 3 > 0
So our effective inequality is 1/[x(x - 3)] ≤ 0 ---> x(x - 3) < 0 (I replaced ≤ with ≤ because 1/[x(x - 3)] can never be equal to zero)
--> Either {x < 0 and (x - 3) > 0} or {x > 0 and (x - 3) < 0}
--> Either {x < 0 and x > 3} or {x > 0 and x < 3}

The first one is not possible for any x.
Hence, our final solution is 0 < x < 3[/quot

Dear Anju

Can you please explain this question again. I was not able to understand how did you prove x² - x + 3 is always positive and why did you consider |x| > 1 and |x| < 1.

Thank you
Simply put, if we consider x^2 - x + 3 => x = negative => x^2 positive, -x will be positive, +3 (positive) --> Hence, expression positive.

x= positive => x^2 = positive, -x negative but less than x^2 [hence x^2 - x is positive] +3 which makes the expression positive, irrespective of whatever value x holds.
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:47 am
Thanked: 2 times

by fifafreak » Thu May 23, 2013 12:28 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Hi,

Can anyone please help me in solving the following inequalities:-

(1). x/(x + 2) <= 1/x
My approach :- x/(x + 2) - 1/x <= 0

After calculating, (x - 2)(x + 1) / x(x + 2) <= 0

What is after this ? how can i get the inequality ? What is the right approach ?

(2). x/(x - 3) <= 1/x

Please help in the above questions.

Thanks
Sachin
Both the problems will have a similar approach. You have to take care of 2 things :
[1] Denominator cannot be zero.
[2] When Numerator is positive, denominator will be negative and vice versa [since the expression is negative]

problem 1.
(x-2)(x-3)/x(x+2) <=0
Numerator positive or zero: x E [-inf, -1]U[2, inf]; Denominator negative: x E (-2,0) => x E (-2,-1]
Numerator negative or zero: x E [-1,2]; Denominator positive: x E (-inf., -2)U(0, inf)=> x E (0,2]

problem 2.

Numerator always positive, hence Denominator should be negative for the inequality to hold true.

x(x-3) < 0 ---> x E (0,3)
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1