BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Mod problem - anything wrong with this approach

Expert replies

by cramya » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:17 pm
Sris,
I think Pardeep did the same thing as u di but the oa seems to be E). I have included my thougths too. Look it over and provide your feedback.


Pradeep,
Whats the source and do they provide any explanation on why its E)?

Regards,
Cramya
Join the discussion

by srisl11 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:38 pm
cramya wrote:Sris,
I think Pardeep did the same thing as u di but the oa seems to be E). I have included my thougths too. Look it over and provide your feedback.


Pradeep,
Whats the source and do they provide any explanation on why its E)?

Regards,
Cramya
I think the OA is wrong...If not I badly need the explanation

Lets say we have to find the value of x.

equation 1 is (x-1)(x-4) = 0
Then x can be either 1 or 4

equation 2 is x-1 != 0
THen x can take any value except 1

But x= 4 is the only value which will satisfy both the equations.
here IMO C not E

If this approach is wrong then probably I have to redo all the problems in equations and inequations :shock:
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:50 pm
You could be right also! I have PM'd Stuart and we will see how this turns out.
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:18 pm
austin wrote:Tryingmybest,

Statement 1: |x+1| = 2|x-1|
Squaring, (x+1)^2 = 4(x-1)^2
=>x^2+1+2x = 4x^2+4-8x
=> 3x^2-10x+3 = 0
=> 3x^2-9x-x+3 = 0
=> 3x(x-3) -1(x-3) = 0
=> (3x-1) (x-3) = 0

How do you get img. roots?
This is a great approach to this question. I agree that the answer is (C), since statement (2) elminates one of the two possible values for x, leaving you with the certainty that x = 1/3.

One note on saving some time. Once you arrived at:

3x^2-10x+3 = 0

you knew that statement (1) gave you two possible values for x, which is enough to say that (1) is insufficient by itself.

When we get to the combination stage (since (2) is clearly insufficient by itself), all we really care about is if x=3 is one of the solutions for statement (1). So, if you're not sure how to factor it, just try plugging in x=3. In this case it works, so we know that statement (2) eliminates one of the two solutions and that combined the statements are sufficient.

Even if we have no clue what the second solution is, knowing that x has only one possible value is all we need to prove sufficiency.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:23 pm
Thanks again Stuart for the explanation/clarification!
Join the discussion