BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Question No. 12 of 1000SC

Expert replies
by isisalaska » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:41 pm
Is debating about idiomatically incorrect?
question No. 12 1000 SC

12. A little under a million years ago, the briny waters of the Baltic Sea began flooding into the cold North Atlantic: geologists are still debating whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm.
(A) whether the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(B) if the flood was gradual or created a cataclysm
(C) about whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(D) whether the flood was gradual or cataclysmic
(E) whether the flood was gradual or it created a cataclysm
Isis Alaska
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

debating over

by aim-wsc » Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:35 am
first of all cut A, B & E.
they dont follow ll lism....

''was gradual or catacylismic''
is right.
therefore remain C & D.

...debating over/about the issue would have been OK.
BUT in this case we hv two things.
DISCARD C.
Join the discussion

by sumitkrishna » Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:54 pm
I agree. "about" is unnecessary here. (D) is the best option.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:50 pm
"debating about" is redundant. You only need "debating." You can have a debate about something, but if you are actively debating, then the meaning of "about" is already covered.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by ajdjmba » Sat Jul 14, 2012 4:48 am
Unable to understand the parallelism in this particular question.
why "flood was gradual or created a cataclysm" is not parallel
and why "the flood was gradual or cataclysmic" is parallel.

Pl help.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1