Assumption

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:24 pm
Thanked: 62 times
Followed by:3 members

Assumption

by niketdoshi123 » Tue Aug 07, 2012 5:18 am
The Action-Packed Gaming Company, based on the success of the previous season's video game featuring the character Sam Li, of the popular Fist of Awe series of martial arts movies, developed for the current season a similar martial arts game featuring a new character who is also a martial arts master. The new game had improved 3-D graphics, enhanced multiplayer capability, and dozens of new martial arts moves developed by real-life masters. However, marketing surveys showed that teenagers were uninterested in this new game, and the game sold very poorly.

The passage implies that an explanation for the failure of the new game is based on doubt regarding which of the following assumptions?

a)Teenagers make purchasing decisions based on the technological merits of video games, not the name recognition of the games' main characters.

b)Buyers of video games prefer to purchase games based on popular movies.

c)The Fist of Awe series of movies was extremely popular with teenagers who regularly purchase video games.

d)Technological improvement from one video game to the next does not guarantee a corresponding increase in sales.

e)The successful video game may have benefited from advertising associated with the Fist of Awe movies, a benefit the failed video game did not have.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 7:08 am
Thanked: 322 times
Followed by:143 members

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:12 am
This is my earlier post concerning this question:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mgmat-cat-ex ... tml#482762
Kasia@MasterGMAT wrote:Let's try to break down the argument:
Premise 1: The Action-Packed Gaming Company launched a new game similar to an older game which featured a famous film character. The new game featured a new character.

Premise 2: The new game was state-of-the-art.

Premise 3: The new game was UNSUCCESSFUL.

Now let's see what we are looking for. We are looking for an explanation for the failure of the new game, right? NO, wait! There is one important word in the question which turns the whole sense upside down. This word is DOUBT. Let's rephrase the question: The passage implies that the game's failure is justified if which of the following is DOUBTFUL/ UNTRUE:

Now try to find which answer is correct.
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course