BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep: In physics journals,

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 991
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:24 members

by shovan85 » Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:05 am
To weaken: Because of last year's less availability of particle accelerators low number of articles were there.

(A) Whatever had been submitted were published: Does not weaken
(B) The average time scientists must wait for access to a particle accelerator has declined: As it has declined thus does not weaken. I feel if the avg time had increased then it would have been considered for Weaken.
(C) Just an Information.
(D) If more than one group of experiments then more publications.
(E) Policies are hampering the frequency of the article publication. Weaken.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

by SmarpanGamt » Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:28 am
The conclusion is on the Articles which declined due to lesser number of partical accelarator. Weak causal connection.

any other info which can suggest some other reason on reduced articles is the winner. IMO E
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1