BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Inequality X and Y

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 18, 2015 8:32 am
For all distinct non-zero values of x and y, is x > y?

(1) x - y > -y
(2) 1/x>1/y
Statement 1: adding y to both sides of x - y > -y, gives us x > 0. Tells us nothing about y. Not Sufficient.

Statement 2: pick some easy numbers. If x = 2 and y = 3, we satisfy the condition, because 1/2 > 1/3. And the answer to the question is NO, x is not bigger than y ,as 2 is not greater than 3.

If x = 2 and y = -3, we satisfy the condition, because 1/2 > -(1/3). And the answer to the question is YES, x is bigger than y, as 2 is greater than -3.
Because we can get a NO and a YES, this is not sufficient.

Together, also not sufficient. Both of the scenarios we used in statement 2 involved a positive x, so we can reuse those scenarios when testing the statements together. Because we can get a NO and a YES, together the statements are still not sufficient.

Answer is E
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by sandipgumtya » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:06 am
Thanks David,
can't we write the second eqn as Y>X.?is it wrong>I chose B because of this.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:58 am
Hi sandipgumtya,

When there are variables in the denominators of fractions, you have to be careful about 'rewriting' the inequalities. The two variables could be both positive OR both negative OR one of each....

For example, if X and Y are both POSITIVE, then you could use...

X = 2, Y = 3

1/2 > 1/3

In this example, the answer to the question (Is X > Y?) is NO.

BUT, if X is positive and Y is NEGATIVE

X = 2 Y = -3

1/2 > -1/3

In this example, the answer to the question is YES.

With variables in the denominators, it's often a good move to just leave the variables there and TEST VALUES to prove whether there's a consistent result or not.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:47 am
can't we write the second eqn as Y>X.?is it wrong>I chose B because of this.
If we take the reciprocal of both sides of an inequality, we must flip the inequality sign if both sides of the inequality are positive or if both sides of the inequality are negative.

For example, 3 < 4, but 1/3 > 1/4
And -3 > -4, but -(1/3) < -(1/4)

However, if one side is positive and one side is negative, we do not flip the inequality sign when taking the reciprocal. 4 > -2, and 1/4 > -(1/2)

In this case, even when testing the statements together, we only know that x is positive. y could be positive or negative.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion