BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

x and y

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:47 am
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:22 am
Thanks for the link Rahul.
I feel the algebraic approach time consuming sometimes, it works for certain problems.
I was look for picking numbers (proper numbers) for this problem to evaluate the question.
I think it works faster for some problems.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:35 am
beat_gmat_09 wrote:Thanks for the link Rahul.
I feel the algebraic approach time consuming sometimes, it works for certain problems.
I was look for picking numbers (proper numbers) for this problem to evaluate the question.
I think it works faster for some problems.
Yes algebraic approaches are time consuming sometimes. But picking numbers also has its own limitations. You must have a good idea about which number you should pick which is equivalent to having a good algebraic concept :).

For this particular question there is also another method which I feel the most easy and elegant method. But to apply this method you should have a clear concept on graphs of certain standard functions.

As I have mentioned earlier, to solve this question we must find the relations of x with √x and x³. Now if you plot these functions (namely f(x) = x, f(x) = √x and f(x) = x³), we can literally see the regions in which y lies.

Image

Referring to the above figure the analysis becomes pretty easier as you visually can see the whole picture.

According to statement 1, y must lie below the blue line. But we can see that for some region y is above the green line (meaning greater than x) and in some region lies below the green line (less than x). Same for statement 2.

Now consider both the statement together. y must lie below both the blue and red lines. We can clearly see this means y always lies below the green line i.e. less than x.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:19 am
Thanks for the effort Rahul, but i am not comfortable with plotting graphs :(
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion