BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 155 th problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:49 pm
I feel the answer is "E".

From statement one :
i.e. x^3-x^5<0 (multiplying the common x)
we can't determine whether x is +ve or -ve.So insufficient.

From statement 2:
x^2<1 (taking 1 at the other side)
So here x could be either +ve or -ve.Insufficient !! (e.g. 4 could be -1/2 or +1/2; if x^2 is less than 1)

Combining them also we can't determine whether x is +ve or -ve.(To satisfy you can take any +ve or -ve value for x)

Let me know whether i am correct or wrong !!
Join the discussion

by simplyjat » Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:12 pm
1)x^3(1-x^2)<0
when a*b is negative it means that either a or b is negative. so here we know that either x^3 is negative or (1-x^2) is negative. And that's pretty much it. no further deductions.

2)x^2-1<0
here we know that x^2-1 is negative, i.e. x^2 is less than one. and that it, no further deductions.

From 2 we know that x^2 is less than one. putting this information in 1, we know that (1-x^2) should be positive.... Thus we can deduce that x^3 is negative in the first statement, which is only possible if x is negative.....

Hope it clears it all...
simplyjat
Join the discussion

Re: OG 155 th problem

by lunarpower » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:02 am
[email protected] wrote:Is X negative?

1)x^3(1-x^2)<0
2)x^2-1<0

Please help me with best strategy to solve this problem.


Peer
the final post on this thread is quite good.

i wanted to give a cautionary note, inspired by the second post:
DO NOT EXPAND FACTORED EXPRESSIONS UNLESS YOU HAVE A VERY, VERY GOOD REASON FOR DOING SO.
in general, factored expressions are extremely useful. it's a cinch to tell whether a factored expression is positive or negative; all you have to do is determine the sign of each of the factors, and then follow the rules for multiplication (pos x pos = neg x neg = pos; pos x neg = neg). if you have to tell whether an expanded polynomial is positive or negative, though, you face a formidable task of weighing the relative sizes of all the different terms in the polynomial. (unless you factor it, of course!)

in general, factored expressions are better than expanded expressions for just about anything you'd ever want to do.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:07 am
also, note that, if you want, you could go in the opposite direction: you could factor these expressions further before tackling the problem.

for instance, you could factor statement (2) into
(x - 1)(x + 1) < 0
from which you'd deduce that x + 1 is positive and x - 1 is negative (because that's the only way the product can be negative). this translates to -1 < x < 1.
INSUFFICIENT, because both positive and negative numbers are contained in this interval.

same sort of logic applies to statement (1) as well:
(x^3)(1 - x)(1 + x) < 0
set out a number line showing the 'solutions' of this inequality (i.e., the numbers that would be its solutions if it were an equation instead of an inequality): -1, 0, and 1. then, test the four resulting regions to see if they work in the inequality:
x < -1: doesn't work
-1 < x < 0: works
0 < x < 1: doesn't work
1 < x: works
INSUFFICIENT, because x can be negative (-1 < x < 0) or positive (1 < x).

if you take the two statements together, the only interval that satisfies both is -1 < x < 0
SUFFICIENT

answer = c
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

Thanks

by [email protected] » Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:25 pm
Thanks a lot for everyone.I think i would soon gain enought confidence to tackle any problem
Join the discussion