-
[email protected]
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
- Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
- Thanked: 63 times
- Followed by:14 members
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A] The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
B] The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
C] The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
D] The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.
E] The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
The OA given is A and I really do not understand why???
According to me the argument can be bifurcated in the following way...
Conclusion: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network.
Premises or the Reasonings: Reason 1: Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
Reason 2: The subway system is outdated and understaffed.
Reason 3: The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
Reason 4: If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
The only question is that do we actually consider the conclusion mentioned in the argument as a problem or current state of affairs...
The first bold faced part is no doubt an explanation, but we have to know that whether it is a current state of affairs or no.
I personally chose E as the answer, I thought that the first bold faced part can be considered a justification. Please tell me where am going wrong really... I am a bit confused between the options A and E...
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A] The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
B] The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author's conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
C] The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
D] The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.
E] The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
The OA given is A and I really do not understand why???
According to me the argument can be bifurcated in the following way...
Conclusion: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city's transportation network.
Premises or the Reasonings: Reason 1: Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
Reason 2: The subway system is outdated and understaffed.
Reason 3: The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
Reason 4: If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city's financial health will be jeopardized.
The only question is that do we actually consider the conclusion mentioned in the argument as a problem or current state of affairs...
The first bold faced part is no doubt an explanation, but we have to know that whether it is a current state of affairs or no.
I personally chose E as the answer, I thought that the first bold faced part can be considered a justification. Please tell me where am going wrong really... I am a bit confused between the options A and E...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
