BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

positive integer n

Expert replies
by das.ashmita » Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:05 am
What is the positive integer n?

(1) For every positive integer m, the product m(m + 1)(m + 2) ... (m + n) is divisible by 16
(2) n^2 - 9n + 20 = 0

OA in the source is C

But I think its E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by anuprajan5 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:16 am
Ashmita,

The answer is C

Statement 1 - m(m=1)(m=2)....(m+n) is divisible by 16. Since these are consecutive integers, I only need a couple of even integers to make it divisible by 16.

For example, 1,2,3,4,5,6 - In this case n is 5
22,23,24 - In this case n is 2.
Insufficient

Statement 2 - This gives us 2 values of n ie: 5 and 4. Insufficient

Combining - we can find m is a series of consecutive integers where n is 5. Just to contradict the case, you can check if you can get a series of 5 consecutive numbers where n is 4. I didn't find one.


Regards
Anup
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:00 am
das.ashmita wrote:What is the positive integer n?

(1) For every positive integer m, the product m(m + 1)(m + 2) ... (m + n) is divisible by 16
(2) n^2 - 9n + 20 = 0

OA in the source is C

But I think its E
Statement 1: For every positive integer m, the product m(m + 1)(m + 2) ... (m + n) is divisible by 16
Since m is positive, m(m+1)(m+2)...(m+n) represents the product of CONSECUTIVE positive integers.
Every other consecutive EVEN integer is a MULTIPLE OF 4.
Thus, if the product includes 3 consecutive EVEN factors, there are two cases:

Case 1: (multiple of 2)(multiple of 4)(multiple of 2)
This product must be divisible by (2)(4)(2) = 16.

Case 2: (multiple of 4)(multiple of 2)(multiple of 4)
This product must be divisible by (4)(2)(4) = 32.

In each case, the product is divisible by 16.
Thus, if the product includes at least 3 consecutive even factors, it will be divisible by 16.

To GUARANTEE that the product will include at least 3 consecutive even factors, the MINIMUM value of n is 5:
m(m+1)(m+2)(m+3)(m+4)(m+5) = the product of 6 consecutive integers.
This product will be composed of exactly 3 consecutive odd factors and exactly 3 consecutive even factors.

If n=4 -- implying a total of 5 consecutive factors -- then the product could be (odd)(even)(odd)(even)(odd).
In this case, the product will not include at least 3 consecutive even factors, with the result that it might not be divisible by 16.
To illustrate:
Neither 1*2*3*4*5 nor 17*18*19*20*21 is divisible by 16.

Since the product must include at least 3 consecutive even factors to GUARANTEE that it will be divisible by 16, n≥5.
No way to determine the exact value of n.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: n² - 9n + 20 = 0
(n-4)(n-5) = 0.
Since it's possible that n=4 or n=5, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Only n=5 satisfies both statements.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:15 pm
das.ashmita wrote:What is the positive integer n?

(1) For every positive integer m, the product m(m + 1)(m + 2) ... (m + n) is divisible by 16
(2) n^2 - 9n + 20 = 0

OA in the source is C

But I think its E
Statement 1: Implies the product of any (n + 1) consecutive positive integers is divisible by 16. Now the product of any 6 or more consecutive integers is always divisible by 16. Hence, (n + 1) ≥ 6 => n ≥ 5

Not sufficient

Statement 2: n² - 9n + 20 = 0
=> (n - 4)(n - 5) = 0
Hence, n = 4 or n = 5

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: As n ≥ 5, n must be equal to 5.

Sufficient

The correct answer is C.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by das.ashmita » Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:16 am
Thankyou Anurag , Mitch and Anup for replying.

I got confused in statement 1

case 1 : let m=2
2*3*4*5*6 is divisible by 16
Here n = 6-2 = 4

case 2 : let consider m=1
1*2*3*4*5*6 is divisible by 16
here n = 6-1 = 5

Can u please tell me what is wrong in assuming case 1
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:15 am
das.ashmita wrote:Thankyou Anurag , Mitch and Anup for replying.

I got confused in statement 1

case 1 : let m=2
2*3*4*5*6 is divisible by 16
Here n = 6-2 = 4

case 2 : let consider m=1
1*2*3*4*5*6 is divisible by 16
here n = 6-1 = 5

Can u please tell me what is wrong in assuming case 1
You have cited ONE CASE in which n=4 yields a product divisible by 16.
But statement 1 requires that the product be divisible by 16 FOR EVERY positive integer m.
If m=1 and n=4, the resulting product is 1*2*3*4*5, which is not divisible by 16.
Thus, n=4 does NOT satisfy the condition that the product be divisible by 16 FOR EVERY positive integer m.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by das.ashmita » Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:19 am
thanks Mitch!!absolutely clear now :)
Join the discussion