transnational corporations

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:14 pm
I would choose C

modest rennaissance-> somewhat of a rebirth

It goes on to say even though it was less proftable before which means it existed before may be both more and less.

C says that exactly

The rest of the choices we have to make a lot of assumptions which is not ok for a inference question like this. We must be able to refer back to the passage and confirm the right answer. Same applies to must be true questions.

The answer will most likely be a rephrase of one or more premises or logical deduction from the premises

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:16 am
IMO C, thats the only option I can see being implied in the passage.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:17 am
Thanked: 1 times

by kartik1979 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:43 am
Agree C `Can only be properly stated from above arguement

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:57 am

by hobby » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:16 pm
Guys, i am confusced between C and A, why can't the answer be A. I implied this from the last sentense in the argument. I need your help please. Thanks

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:41 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:2 members

by anshulseth » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:04 pm
A is incorrect, coz there is a difference between 'to win' and 'to handle'.
If its 'to win' in last sentence that made you go for A, then its incorrect.
I hope its clear now.
Asset

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 10:51 pm
The official answer is C. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain