Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

mgmat-government

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:06 am
The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sandysai » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:40 am
I Feel its E

THis is only choice where Goverement representatives makes statement in their course of offiicial duties.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:49 am
Has to b e
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:41 pm
Agree with E.

However, why wouldn't D be the answer? It seems that we would have to know that the plastic surgeon isn't a government employee (is this acceptable to bring in as external knowledge?)
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by MRehman » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 am
One more for E
Join the discussion

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:01 am
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:20 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
E here too. whats the answer?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:33 am
E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:54 am
reply2spg wrote:E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
i chose E instead of C because C just talks about an company's stock, it doesnt say anything about government and government and honest government and its rules, futhermore, even if something bad about the company was noticed by the public, it doesnt mean that it will influence to the whole public, it just impact to the number of its employers, workers and investers! for an example, the company Sharekhan in indian has been unprofitable for years and made fake accounting records, you know it and your people know it but it cant influence to you if you dont deal with that company.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:05 am
Got you thanks
diebeatsthegmat wrote:
reply2spg wrote:E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
i chose E instead of C because C just talks about an company's stock, it doesnt say anything about government and government and honest government and its rules, futhermore, even if something bad about the company was noticed by the public, it doesnt mean that it will influence to the whole public, it just impact to the number of its employers, workers and investers! for an example, the company Sharekhan in indian has been unprofitable for years and made fake accounting records, you know it and your people know it but it cant influence to you if you dont deal with that company.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion