BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmat-government

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 8:06 am
The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sandysai » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:40 am
I Feel its E

THis is only choice where Goverement representatives makes statement in their course of offiicial duties.

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:49 am
Has to b e
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:41 pm
Agree with E.

However, why wouldn't D be the answer? It seems that we would have to know that the plastic surgeon isn't a government employee (is this acceptable to bring in as external knowledge?)
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by MRehman » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 am
One more for E
Join the discussion

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:01 am
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:20 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
E here too. whats the answer?
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:33 am
E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:54 am
reply2spg wrote:E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
i chose E instead of C because C just talks about an company's stock, it doesnt say anything about government and government and honest government and its rules, futhermore, even if something bad about the company was noticed by the public, it doesnt mean that it will influence to the whole public, it just impact to the number of its employers, workers and investers! for an example, the company Sharekhan in indian has been unprofitable for years and made fake accounting records, you know it and your people know it but it cant influence to you if you dont deal with that company.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:05 am
Got you thanks
diebeatsthegmat wrote:
reply2spg wrote:E for me too

But how will you eliminate C.

Passage talks that 'information that advances the public interest' and as per C it is advancing public interest, so why C is wrong?
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.

A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
i chose E instead of C because C just talks about an company's stock, it doesnt say anything about government and government and honest government and its rules, futhermore, even if something bad about the company was noticed by the public, it doesnt mean that it will influence to the whole public, it just impact to the number of its employers, workers and investers! for an example, the company Sharekhan in indian has been unprofitable for years and made fake accounting records, you know it and your people know it but it cant influence to you if you dont deal with that company.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion