BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

MGMAT Flash card Page 91 - I intend not only to win but

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

MGMAT Flash card Page 91 - I intend not only to win but

by vineetbatra » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:36 pm
Q

I intend not only to win but also break the
world record; my opponent is neither a threat
to me nor, quite frankly, intimidating to
anyone.

Explanation

This question is about parallelism. Elements in a "not
only...but also" construction, as well as elements in a
"neither...nor" construction, must be parallel.

Correct: I intend not only to win but also to break the world record; my opponent is neither threatening to me nor, quite frankly, intimidating to anyone.

My question is that why do we need a to before break, I was under the impression that in parallelism we do not need to repeat, to, was, can.

Secondly when I am changing "a Threat" to "Threatening" it sounds like that the opponent is neither threatening me, as in, verbally threatening me rather than a percieved threat. Also, a threat is a noun, isn't intimidating playing the role of a gerund, so they are parallel.

Please advice.
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:52 pm
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:9 members

by rsadana1 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:53 pm
1: Repetition of "to"
The list is as follows:
not only "to win"
but also "break"

Since "to" is after not only, it cannot be considered to go with break as well. That is why we need to repeat "to".

You would be correct if the sentence were written as

TO not only "win"
but also "break".

Now to is considered to go with both win and break and hence you should not repeat it with break.

If you think better with parenthesis then you may think of it as follows:

to (not only win) (but also break) - To common
not only (to win) but also (to break) - To repeated

2: Verb-ing form
The list is as follows:
Neither a threat to me
Nor intimidating to anyone.
The list above is not parallel since it is not consistent.
threat is not parallel to intimidating
So to make this list parallel we will need to make both as nouns or both as verb-ing. Thus:

Neither threatening TO me
Not intimidating to anyone.

The use of "to" after threatening makes sure that it is not used as a verb.

You are right about the fact that "intimidating" is acting as a noun in this sentence so we have a noun as parallel to noun, so why do we need to change threat to verb-ing form. The reason is "consistency". We always need to make sure that our lists are as consistent as possible.

I hope this helps.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:11 pm
Thanks for the detailed response rsadana.

If I say I like to play, swim and dance. I do not need to repeat to with swim and dance, but if I say

I like playing, then I have to use swmimming and dancing. The point I am making here is that, to does not need to be repeated; however any other parallel parts of speech needs to be structurally parallel.

I did read somewhere in the MGMAT SC guide that a noun and a Gerund can be parallel, it also said something about a complex gerund, something I do not recall, thats whay I thought that a threat and intimidating can be parallel.

Also, if I am using threatening it seems to have changed the meaning from a perceived threat to a verbal threat. For example, I can write I am threatening you blah blah, which is a verbal threat. Or A tiger is a threat to deer's existence, here threat is a perceived threat.

I hope I am able to explain my question.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1