assumption

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:06 am
Thanked: 6 times

assumption

by gmatnmein2010 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:42 pm
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
(D) The government's construction projects would not on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective.
I was not able to paraphrase the argument help???
LSAT
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:56 pm
IMO E the conclusion is that the government is not quilty of any fiscal wastefulness. So then the question I asked myself is, what is being introduced to say that they could be guilty of fiscal wastefulness. This has to do with the vacant offices not meeting requirements. So that's why I chose E... hope it's correct.
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:59 pm
Many atimes in assumption question an ans which eliminates the possibility of a condition, which can weaken the conclusion is the assumption
This is a typical example of such assumption question

a) eliminates the possibility of a condition, which can weaken the conclusion is the assumption and hence is the correct ans IMO

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:39 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by okigbo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:14 am
OA: A

I quickly eliminated E bc it was too drastic "beyond any reasonable doubt" made me go 'woah, woah - too too much'

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:35 am
P1. Several cities, Government--> ambitious construction projects (though there are a lot of vacant offices)
P2. Vacant Offices --> do not meet the facility requirement.
Conclusion : Government is not guilty of fiscal wastefulness.

We are talking about fiscal wastefulness. So we will have to prove that the construction is not costlier than facility provision in the vacant office spaces, because if it had been more costly, then the Government would have been fiscally responsible for the unnecessary expenditure.

So I think A is the answer

Moreover the argument is just an afterthought, so I think E could not probably be the assumption of the argument. Because if E is the assumption, as the construction has already started, the cost-effectiveness should have already been established.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:17 am
IMO (A). It is the correct answer here. Because. Gov can improve the old offices as per their requirement. Instead of doing that thing gov has made new construction. That means later part is cost effective, otherwise govt . will not do that.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:50 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
Correct : If we negate this statement, the argument falls apart. Hence this is the correct assumption.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
Incorrect : This will only weaken the argument.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government's requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
Incorrect : ===== same as above =====

(D) The government's construction projects would not on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
Incorrect : This cannot be assumed from the above stimulus.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective.
Incorrect : This is way too extreme to be considered an assumption.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:24 pm
In my opinion A is the most logical one.