Author: A society that allows unlimited copying of original written work will have no literary works because all creative writing will cease. So, it must be assumed that the more protection provided against the copying of original written work, the larger the amount of literary works available.

Economist: Your supposition cannot be correct, because your hypothesis would suggest that not allowing any photocopying of original written work would lead to the greatest number of literary works available


The economist's response to the author's argument suggests which of the following?

The economist is purposefully misusing a key term in the author's statements to show that the author's premises are self-contradictory.

The economist and the author could both be correct because they are interpreting a key term in two distinct ways.

The economist is undermining the credibility of the author by explicitly challenging the author's understanding of the economic principles of supply and demand

The economist has proven the author's statement to be incorrect by using a detailed example of a situation where the author's conclusion is proven false


The economist has been proven incorrect because the economist is unable to prove the author's statement that creative writing will cease if unlimited copying of original written work is allowed.


OA



B

Why Eis incorrect ?