BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT CAT 5---west indian manatee

Expert replies
by prachich1987 » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:31 pm
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.

B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.

D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.

E)Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:30 am
IMO B:
This is an copied question from gmatprep by mgmat. In option B you start wondering from where this motor blade came? It came because it was a nonsensical copy of another real Q.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by RACHVIK » Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:29 am
The question stem states that 'Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe. '.

Its rather a very strong conclusion (NONE!!) and hence would require a strong support. Only B comes close to that.

All manatee swim at a level at which they can be harmed and they cannot escape it anyways!!


Can you advise the OA??

Thanx
Rachvik
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:10 pm
Hi there!

Here's how I broke this argument down:

Conclusion: Manatees are not safe.

Evidence: None given.

Assumptions: That conservation efforts + criminal penalties + stickers do not equal "safe"

Question Rephrase: What supports the argument?

Prediction: Anything that more clearly shows how the author's definition of "safe" is NOT reached by current efforts -- basically proof that manatees are unsafe

(D) may be tempting, but does not show how the statistic relates to the current efforts. I would also choose (B) because of the phrase in the passage "where Americans like to play." If Americans' motorboats are hurting all of the manatees, it makes sense why the conservation efforts, criminal penalties and stickers have not made the animals more "safe."
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:44 am
The OA is B
Join the discussion

by ashforgmat » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:04 am
It should be B since the argument speaks about how NONE of the manatees can be considered to be safe...

And option B tells us that ALL the manatees swim at depths where they may be hurt by the motorboats...
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Tue May 29, 2012 12:11 pm
VivianKerr wrote:Hi there!

Here's how I broke this argument down:

Conclusion: Manatees are not safe.

Evidence: None given.

Assumptions: That conservation efforts + criminal penalties + stickers do not equal "safe"

Question Rephrase: What supports the argument?

Prediction: Anything that more clearly shows how the author's definition of "safe" is NOT reached by current efforts -- basically proof that manatees are unsafe

(D) may be tempting, but does not show how the statistic relates to the current efforts. I would also choose (B) because of the phrase in the passage "where Americans like to play." If Americans' motorboats are hurting all of the manatees, it makes sense why the conservation efforts, criminal penalties and stickers have not made the animals more "safe."

I am still not convinced how you eliminated C so easily.
The argument says,
Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe..

To strengthen this, it can be useful to say that most(mind it!!) of the tourists are not aware of the government's efforts and hence might not be careful towards the animal's preservation and hence might be responsible for their killings ?
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:17 am
Yes the OA is B. It came down to the options A and B for me. But because in the stimulus, such an extreme word all manatees is used, B is the correct answer.

The GMAT loves to trap the students, by using words like some, many, most , often, all, most often than not etc etc etc...

Thank You.
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion