BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Can somebody please help with solutions to these questions

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Ramesh2007 wrote:Please somebody help me with the solution to these questions.
Can you please post the questions individually in separate threads.

The discussion will benefit a few folks on this forum.
Join the discussion

Here are my questions

by Ramesh2007 » Sun May 20, 2007 12:25 pm
Thanks Jayhawk. I have them individually here.
I will post the rest of the questions in another thread
Attachments
PS-1.JPG
PS-2.JPG
PS-3.JPG
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun May 20, 2007 9:19 pm
1. Ans = 133

Compute num students 'x' as

5/x = 3/80
x = 133.33

Now, the ratio of TA to students should be > 3/80. So, in the fraction
5/133.333, either 5 should increase or 133.333 should decrease.

133 hence gives you the absolute max

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Ans = 10

tn = tn-1 - 3
tn = tn-2 - 2*3
...
tn = t1 - (n-1)*3

-4 = 23 - (n-1)*3
n-1 = 9
n= 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. E

Use POE to solve this.

xy + z = xy + xz

Now, if z = 0, we have xy = xy which means x and y can be of any
value. Eliminate A and C

If x = 1, we have y+z = y+z. Again, y and z can be any value
to satisfy above equation. So, eliminate B and D

That leaves us with E.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Sun May 20, 2007 11:31 pm
xy + z = xy + xz
If z = 0 then xz = z = 0 and LHS = RHS = xy
If x = 1 then z = xz and LHS = RHS = xy + z
Hence Choice E
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Sun May 20, 2007 11:42 pm
It's important to remember in Q3 that the ratio shoulbe be greater than 3:80; If the ratio asked was equal to 3:80 then for every teaching assistant there would be 80/3 = 26.67 students; Hence if there were 5 assistants there would be 80/3 * 5 or 133.333 students for every teaching assiatant. Since we require a ratio greater than 3:80 there should be lesser students per assistant (that's the only way we can increase the ratio); hence answer would be 133
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Sun May 20, 2007 11:48 pm
Perimeter = 16 + 16 * sqr rt. 2
For an isoceles right angle triangle the sides are in the ratio 1:1:sqr. rt 2
So the perimeter would be x + x + (x*sq rt. 2)
2x + x*sqr rt. 2 = 16 + 16sqr rt. 2
Taking x*sqr rt. 2 common
x*sqr rt. 2 (sqr rt. 2 + 1) = 16 (1 + sqr rt.2)
x*sqr rt. 2 = 16
Hence hypotenuese = 16 (since hypotenuese = x* sqr rt. 2)
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 1:01 am
Statement I : we can make out from this statement that none of the white balls had even numbers on them or P(x and y) = 0. However, this Statement fails to give us the total number of white balls...hence insufficient
Statement II : Say probability of ball being white = P(x); Probability that ball is even = P(y); P(x) - P(y) = .2
We need to Find Probability of P(x) U P(y)
P(x) U P(y) = P(x) + P(y) - P(x and y); Insufficient

Statement I and II: Even after combining the 2 we only know P(x and y); hence E
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 1:10 am
Statement I : From this we have two pairs of co-ordinates for line l; hence we can find the slops of line l
y = mx+c ; m = y2-y1 / x2-x1 = 2/1 = 2
So the slope of the other line should be -1/2 for product of the 2 slopes to be 0; hence insufficient (we don't know the slopes of line k)
Statement II: Co-ordinates of line k are (4,0) and (0,2). Hence slope = 2-0/0-4 = 2/-4 = -1/2; Hence insufficient (since we don't know the slope of line l)
Statement I and II : After combining the 2 we can deduce that the product of the slopes of the two lines is -1

Hence C
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 1:14 am
arithmetic mean = (6*2 + 7*4 + 8*7 + 9*9 + 10*3) / 25 = (12+28+56+81+30)/25 = 8.28
Hence 8.3 should be the answer
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 1:15 am
Different combinations = 4C2 * 3C2 = 6*3 = 18
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 1:18 am
Let length of shorter piece be x and that of the longer piece be y

Statement I : y = x + 20 ; Insufficient since we have two unknowns and 1 equation

Statement II : x = y/3 ; Insufficient since we have 2 unknowns and 1 equation

Statment I & II : We can solve the 2 equations simultaneously or even use substitution; Hence C should be the answer
Join the discussion